Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001776

Original file (ND1001776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ICFN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100706

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630620 [MISCONDUCT]

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19880420 - 19880425     Active: 19880426 - 19910725 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19910726     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19950728      Highest Rank/Rate: IC 2
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 67
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3. 5 ( 6 )      Behavior: 3.3 ( 6 )        OTA: 3.60

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) CGSOSR SSBN Deterrent Patrol Pin (9) LoC (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 19950524 :       Article (Wrongful use of a controlled substance , marijuana, o/o 19950507 )
         Awarded : (to E-4) Susp ended: for 1 month

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 2 October 1996, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable based on his total record of service and because his misconduct occurred while on leave.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 09 08 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . The Board c omplete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did reflect for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance , marijuana , o/o 7 May 1995, as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB msg 192012Z May 95 ) . The Applicant did not have a pre-service drug waiver for illegal drug use prior to entering the Navy , but did acknowledge his complete understanding of the Navy’s zero tolerance policy regarding illegal drug use/drug abuse on 19 Apr 1988, 29 Apr 1988, 18 May 1992, and 31 Mar 1994. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation , which is mandatory per the Naval Military Personnel Manual . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure on 1 Jun 1995 , the Applicant exercised his right to consult with a qualified counsel, but waived his rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative separation board . The Applicant was separated from the Navy on 28 Jul 1995 with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse).

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable based on his total record of service and because his misconduct occurred while on leave. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the N aval S ervice in order to maintain good order and discipline; violation of Article 112a meets this standard . The Applicant signed the USN Drug Policy on 19 Apr 1988, 29 Apr 1988, 18 May 1992, and 31 Mar 1994. He was fully aware there is a zero tolerance policy for drug abuse , and he acknowledged the consequences. While he may feel that his one-time use while on leave reduces the seriousness of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful disregard of th e zero tolerance policy and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Sailor’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under H onorable conditions. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a Sailor commits or omits an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a member of the Naval Service . The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Sailors , especially considering his grade, experience , and length of service, and f alls far short of w hat is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200809

Original file (ND1200809.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment and educational opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301092

Original file (ND1301092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030513 - 20040127Active:Pre-Service Drug Waiver: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040128Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070918Highest Rank/Rate: AZ3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 64EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(4)Behavior:3.51(4)OTA: 3.91Awards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001546

Original file (ND1001546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks discharge and RE code upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401181

Original file (ND1401181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002259

Original file (ND1002259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable, because it was based on an isolated incident in 48 months of service. In accordance with section 1553 (d)(2), the service secretary expedited a final decision and accorded the case sufficient priority to achieve an expedited resolution.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000586

Original file (ND1000586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 08 April 2009, the Separation Authority approved the Command’s recommendation for discharge and designated that the basis for separation would be Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), having determined that the evidence of record supported the discharge and that the characterization of service as recommended, was warranted. The Separation Authority reviewed the evidence of record and the gravity of the charges and directed the Applicant be discharged for Misconduct (Commission of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000318

Original file (ND1000318.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001563

Original file (ND1001563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060412 - 20061002Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20061003Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080701Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 84EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 2.00Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100930

Original file (ND1100930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant contends the results of the command-directed urinalysis in which he tested positive for marijuana use were improperly used in determining his character of service upon discharge.2. With no other significant misconduct or negative evaluation reports in the record, the Board concluded this issue to have merit and relief was warranted in an upgrade of characterization of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301153

Original file (ND1301153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001776

Similar Decisions