Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001706
Original file (ND1001706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EN3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100629
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20000614 - 20001204     Active:   20001205 – 20040321 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20040322     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050920      Highest Rank/Rate: EN2
 Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 30 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 43
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 4.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.71

Awards and Decorations ( corrected ):       GWOTSM (3) (3) (2)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP:

- 20050803 :       Article (Drugs - THC 104 ng/ml) , o/o 20050720
                  Awarded : RESTR EPD FOP RIR (to E-4) Suspended: NONE

SCM:     SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          Character of Service , should read: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         “ MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)
         Block 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM S ERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (3) , NAVY AND MARINE CORPS OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON (3) , NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY BATTLE “E” RIBBON (2) , NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL, GOOD CONDUCT AWARD, LETTER OF COMMENDATION (5) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.







Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until
1 June 2008, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Applicant contends he was improperly advised to not seek counsel to pursue a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge.
2.       Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident in four years and nine months of otherwise honorable service.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 08 25             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one for o f the Uniform Code of Military J ustice (UCMJ): Article ( Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance, marijuana 104 ng/ml, as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB msg 012113Z Aug 05). The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using illegal drugs prior to entering the Navy. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory per the Naval Military Personnel Manual . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure on 3 Aug 2005 , the Applicant elected his right to consult with a qualified coun sel, but waived his rights to submit a written statement and request an administrative separation board . The Applicant was separated from t he Navy on 20 Sep 2005 with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse).

: ( D ecisional) (Equity/Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends he was improperly advised to not seek counsel to pursue a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. In reviewing the Applicant’s service records, the Board noted the Applicant initialed his election to exercise his right to consult with a qualified counsel on the 3 Aug 2005 notification of administrative separation processing. Additionally, he elected to waive his rights to submit a written statement or request an administrative separation board. With no evidence to the contrary, the Board found that the Applicant was properly advised of his rights and he initialed and signed his choice to elect and/or waive certain rights in accordance with the orders and directives in effect at the time of his separation. Since t he NDRB is not an investigative body, an y allegations of coercion or withholding of legal rights as afforded by law should be made to the Naval Inspector General ’ s Office.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his misconduct was an isolated incident in four years and nine months of otherwise honorable service. Despite a service member’s prior record of se rvice, certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the N aval S er vice in order to maintain good order and discipline ; violation of Article 112a meets this standard . The Applicant signed the USN Drug Policy on 13 Jun 2000 and completed Zero - Tolerance Drug Abuse training on 4 Dec 2000 while in the D elayed Entry Program . He was fully aware there is a zero - tolerance policy for drug abuse , and he acknowledged the consequences. T he record clearly reflects his misconduct was willful and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or he should not be held accountable for his actions. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a Sailor commits an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a member of the Naval Service. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Sailors, especially considering his grade and length of service, and f alls short of w hat is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service. Relief denied.



Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401164

    Original file (ND1401164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Full relief by changing the Narrative Reason for Separation to Admin Sep was not granted, because Misconduct (Drug Abuse) was the most accurate reason for the Applicant’s separation.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500295

    Original file (ND1500295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Types of Witnesses Who Testified Expert: Character:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000574

    Original file (ND1000574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301207

    Original file (ND1301207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Misconduct (Drug Abuse) indicates a violation of the Navy’s zero-tolerance drug policy, which requires mandatory processing for administrative separation.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000810

    Original file (ND1000810.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Nondecisional issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in his discharge characterization and change in narrative reason for separation in order to reenlist in the United States Army. Rather, the NDRB examines the propriety and the equity of an Applicant’s discharge and is authorized to change the characterization of that service or the reason for discharge if factors of equity or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901740

    Original file (ND0901740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Review and upgrade RE-4 status in order to reenlist in the Navy Reserve.2. Since no other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged, a change would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000899

    Original file (ND1000899.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Navy granted him a waiver to enlist.Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301642

    Original file (MD1301642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing all the facts and circumstances of the case and reviewing the recommendations from the chain of command, the Commanding General determined to not suspend the separation and ordered the Applicant to be discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for Misconduct (Drug Abuse). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901989

    Original file (ND0901989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the post service documentation provided, an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400403

    Original file (ND1400403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...