Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001541

Original file (ND1001541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-CSSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100525

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R     20010816 - 20020219     Active: 20020220 - 20060122

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060123     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20061019      Highest Rank/Rate: CS3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 27 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 31
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3 .0 ( 7 )      Behavior: 1 .0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2 . 13

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol (3) KDM SCWS

Periods of UA : 20060201 - 20060225 (24 days )
20060227 - 20060302 (3 days )

NJP:

- 20061018 :       Article (Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer , on or about 20 Jun 06)
         Awarded : (45 days) EPD (45 days) Susp ended: (30 days) EPD (30 days)

SCM:     CC:      Retention Warning Counseling :

SPCM:

- 20060608 :       Art icle (Absence without leave) , 20060201-20060225 (24 days)
         Art icle (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substance ) , 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Wrongful use of marijuana, o/o 20060117
         Specification 2: Wrongful use of marijuana, o/o 20060127
         Sentence : RIR(to E-1) (45 days) (45 days)

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until
1 June 2008, Article 1910-146, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        Applicant seeks medical coverage for injuries she claim s to have sustained during service.
2.       Applicant contends her misconduct was an isolated incident in otherwise honorable service.
3.       Applicant contends her drug use was a result of command mistreatment after submission of a sexual harassment claim .

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 08 18             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warnings, but did reflect for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer, o/o 20 Jun 2006) and one special court martial (SPCM) for violation of UCMJ Article ( Absence without leave, 1 Feb 2006-25 Feb 2006, 24 days) and Article ( Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance, 2 specifications: o/o 17 Jan 2006, marijuana; o/o 27 Jan 2006, marijuana ) . The Applicant ’s record also revealed she had admitted to using marijuana approximately 3 times prior to entering the Navy , which also included failure of a urinalysis test in Jan 2002 while trying to enlist in the U.S. Army . Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory per the Naval Military Personnel Manual . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether the Applicant exercised or waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative separation board . The A pplicant was separated from the U.S. Navy on 19 Oct 2006 wit h an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Drug Abuse).

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks medical coverage for injuries she claim s to have sustained during service. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant contends her drug use was a result of command mistreatment after submission of a sexual harassment claim. T he NDRB is not an investigative body, and allegations of sexual assault or the mishandling of allegations should be made to an appropriate law enforcement organization or the Naval Inspector General ’ s Office.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her misconduct was an isolated incident in otherwise honorable service. Despite a service member’s prior record of se rvice, certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the N aval S er vice in order to maintain good order and discipline ; violation of Article 112a meet s this standard . The Applicant signed the USN Drug Policy on 28 Jan 2002. She was fully aware there is a zero - tolerance policy for drug abuse , and she acknowledged the consequences. While s he may feel command mistreatment or personal stressors were cause s of h er misconduct, the record clearly reflects her misconduct was willful and demonstrated s he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Appl icant was not responsible for her conduct or s he should not be held accountable for h er actions. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when a Sailor commits or omits an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a member of the Naval Service. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Sailors, especially considering her grade and length of service, and f alls short of w hat is required for an upgrade in the characterization of service. Relief denied.

S ummary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice and r ecord e ntries , the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300117

Original file (MD1300117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The use of marijuana was a conscious decision to violate the tenets of honorable and faithful service.After an exhaustive review, the NDRB determined PTSD did not mitigate the Applicant’s misconduct.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001573

Original file (ND1001573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300502

Original file (MD1300502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In a 15 May 2009 recommendation from the Applicant’s commanding officer concerning the administrative separation of the Applicant, he stated, “Lance Corporal [Applicant] was subject to a previous administrative separation for using drugs and since then he has been implicated in two more serious cases of misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001494

Original file (MD1001494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Full relief to Honorable was not granted due to the seriousness of the offense and the seniority of the Applicant.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500670

Original file (ND1500670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001563

Original file (ND1001563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060412 - 20061002Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20061003Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080701Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 84EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 2.00Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400143

Original file (MD1400143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant is not eligible for further reviews by the NDRB. ” Additional Reviews : After...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000257

Original file (MD1000257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301747

Original file (MD1301747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

of controlled substances; also advised of being processed for administrative separation) Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300530

Original file (MD1300530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001541

Similar Decisions