Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001464
Original file (ND1001464.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SHSA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100506
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020716 - 20020717     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20020718     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20041210      Highest Rank/Rate: SHSA
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 23 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.00

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : 2

- 20011003 :      Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Article (failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 200410 15 :       Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM : NONE       SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling : 1

- 20031020 :       For corrective actions following NJP for failure to obey order or regulation and insubordinate conduct.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 Decisional issues : The Applicant contends that his characterization of service at discharge was inequitable in that it is contradictory to his last performance evaluation.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 0818            Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue related to the equity of his discharge for the NDRB’s consideration; additionally , the NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the Applicant’s discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant did not provide any additional documentation for the NDRB’s consideration or any additional documentation to rebut the NDRB’s presumption of regularity in governmental affairs that was not already contained in his official service record .

The Applicant entered military service at age 1 9 on a four-year enlistment as a Storekeeper ; he completed two year s and five months of his service obligation before being discharged. The Applicant’s enlistment acceptance into the Navy included one waiver to induction standards for depend e nts . The Applicant’s official record of service during his enlistment period contains one NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention-counseling warning. The Applicant ’ s service record also contains two nonjudicial punishments for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), specifically , Article 91 ( Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer , 2 specifications) and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulations).

The Applicant was discharged from the Naval Service due to Misconduct , specifically, having established a pattern of misconduct as defined by Article 1910-140 of the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN). The Separation Authority reviewed the Applicant’s record of service during his current enlistment period; he determined that the Applicant’s documented misconduct of record did establish the minimum requirement for discharge based on a pattern of misconduct; that separation in the Applicant’s case was warranted; and further, that the proposed characterization of service - General (Under Honorable Conditions) - was warranted. As such, the Separation Authority directed the Applicant be discharged for the reason as stated and that he receive an RE-4 reenlistment code (not recommended for reenlistment). The NDRB was unable to review the Applicant’s complete discharge package as portions were not appended to his official service record; in the absence of a complete discharge package, the NDRB presumed regularity in governmental affairs. The NDRB presumed the Applicant was accorded all his administrative rights regarding processing for separation. The documented separation code indicates the Applicant did not warrant an administrative separation board due to the proposed characterization of service and not having achieved at least six years of total active service.

( Decisional Issue) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his characterization of service at discharge was inequitable in that it was contradictory to his last performance evaluation.

 Propriety - The NDRB reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order . In accordance with the MILPERSMAN, a service member may be discharged, involuntarily, when their conduct or performance of duties meets one of the established reasons for separation. The Applicant was discharged from the Naval Service due having established a pattern of misconduct as defined by Article 1910-140 of the MILPERSMAN. Although the administrative discharge was the result of his misconduct, it was not part of a punitive punishment awarded at a trial by court-martial, which could have resulted in a substantially more harsh discharge. Based upon the available service records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. T he Applicant received a formal retention counseling warning during his enlistment ; he failed to comply with that warning and continued to engage in misconduct of a discreditable nature. Given the two nonjudicial punishments, coupled with a written retention warning that the Applicant violated , the required elements for separation based on Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct) were satisfied. After a detailed review of the facts, circumstances, and issues unique to this discharge action, the NDRB determined that the Applicant was discharged properly in accordance with the MILPERSMAN. As such, relief based on matters of propriety is not warranted.

 Equity - The Applicant contends that his characterization of service at discharge was inequitable in that it was contradictory to his last performance evaluation. The Applicant submitted an evaluation that was signed in July 2004 indicating he had potential to become an outstanding Sailor. Unfortunately, in October 2004, he was found guilty at NJP of violating UCMJ Article 91, which, when combined with his earlier NJP and Page 13 retention warning, satisfied the requirement for discharge under a Pattern of Misconduct. A service member’s characterization of service at discharge is recognition of performance and conduct during an enlistment; it is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation or any previous periods of honorable service. When the quality of a member’s service has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for military personnel, it is appropriate to characterize that period of service under H onorable conditions. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful, but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duties outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s record of performance and conduct reflected a documented pattern of misconduct - willful violations of the UCMJ based on an inability to comply with rules and regulation. After reviewing the Applicant’s official service record and supporting documentation, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the characterization of his service, was honest and faithful; however, the Applicant’s documented misconduct wa s a significant negative aspect of the member’s conduct and did outweigh the positive aspects of his performance . As such, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s misconduct did constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service and that the characterization of service at discharge was appropriate, was equitable, and was consistent with the characterization of discharge given others in similar circumstances. The NDRB determined that an upgrade would be inappropriate; accordingly, relief is denied.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the discharge process, the NDRB found that the discharge was proper, equitable, and not prejudicial to the Applicant. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301912

    Original file (ND1301912.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Though the Applicant’s current DD Form 214 states that he was discharged for a Condition, Not a Disability, he was not notified of administrative separation processing for this reason nor was there any indication that he had a condition that warranted separation. The NDRB will request that Commander, Navy Personnel Command correct the errors and issue a new DD Form 214 that accurately reflects Pattern of Misconduct as the Narrative Reason for Separation (Block 28).Summary: After a thorough...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101798

    Original file (ND1101798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined that the Narrative Reason for Separation should change to MISCONDUCT to reflect that she was discharged for Commission of a Serious Offense.Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000128

    Original file (ND1000128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000500

    Original file (ND1000500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000172

    Original file (ND1000172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Nondecisional issues:(1) Applicant seeks relief in the form of an upgrade in discharge characterization of service in order to obtain Montgomery G.I. This issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief; there is no requirement or law that grants the NDRB the authority to re-characterize discharges based solely on the issue of obtaining...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801294

    Original file (ND0801294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000584

    Original file (ND1000584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority determined that the preponderance of the evidence supported both reasons for discharge and that separation from the Naval Service was warranted; as such, he directed that the Applicant be separated and that the basis for separation on the DD Form214 be Pattern of Misconduct. The Separation Authority further determined that the Applicant should be discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of his service and that he receive an RE-4...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200733

    Original file (ND1200733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200963

    Original file (ND1200963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of controlled substances, to wit: marijuana and methamphetamine) Awarded: Oral admonitionRIR Suspended: SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001709

    Original file (ND1001709.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...