Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001270
Original file (ND1001270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AOAA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100423
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20030117 - 20030720     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20030721     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050211      Highest Rank/Rate: AOA A
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.34

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle , Pistol ,

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:

C C :

- 20041012 :       Offense: D riving U nder the I nfluence of Alcohol [ date of offense - 25 Sept 2004 ]
         Sentence : 96 hours community service; Level I alcohol treatment; drivers license suspended for 90 days; and $705.00 in fines

- 20041027 :       Offense: Statutory G ross M isdemeanor S exual S eduction of a M inor ; 2 counts. [ Date of offense - 11 July 2004 ]
         Sentence : Probation for 3 years; register as sex offender for 7 years ; and $25.00 in fines

Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 and Article 120.



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 Decisional issues : The Applicant did not identify any specific issues related to the equity or propriety of his discharge.

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 0628            Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge, if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant did not identif y any issue s of impropriety or inequity for the NDRB’s consideration; however , the NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the Applicant’s discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of both equity and propriety. The Applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence for the NDRB’s consideration or to rebut the NDRB’s presumption of regularity in the conduct of Government al affairs .

The Applicant’s record of service contains two civilian convictions in the state of Nevada for Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and for a Gross Misdemeanor with a Minor. In accordance with Article 1910, sect ion 233 , and 142 of the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), the nature of the misconduct required mandatory processing for administrative separation. On 04 November 2004, t he Applicant was notified of the proposed separation action pursuant to Article 1910-142 (Misconduct – Commission of a Serious Offense) and Article 1910-14 4 ( Misconduct – Civilian Convict i on ) . The NDRB reviewed the Applicant ’ s administrative separation package; the Applicant was notified using the board notification procedure and acknowledge d and completed his response to the notification on 15 November 2004. He was advised that the least favorable characterization of service warranted for this separation action was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. The Applicant elected to exercise his right to consult with qualified legal counsel and to submit a written statement to the Separation Authority; however, the Applicant waived his right to request his proposed discharge action be presented to an administrative hearing board.

On 14 December 2004, the command forwarded their recommendation for separation and for characterization of service to the Separation Authority ; the commander recommended separation due to the nature of the misconduct, but that due to extenuating circumstances, the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable conditions) characterization of his service at discharge . T he Applicant was directed to be separated locally under the authority of Article 1910-700 of the MILPERSMAN on 05 January 2005 . He received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service and a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct – Commission of a Serious Offense. Finally, the Applicant received an RE-4 reentry code on his DD F orm 2 14 ( not recommended for reenlistment ) .

( NDRB Board Issues ) ( ) . The Applicant did not identify any issues to the NDRB. However, the NDRB did a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Navy to maintain proper order and discipline. In accordance with Article 1910-142 of the MILPERSMAN, servicemembers may be separated based on the commission of a serious military offense when the Commanding Officer believes the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation and the offense would warrant a punitive discharge if adjudicated at trial by court-martial. The Applicant’s service record formally documents a civilian conviction for Driving under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI), which, if adjudicated under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, would have been a violation of Article 111. I n accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial, violation of th is Article of the UCMJ warrant s a punitive discharge and confinement for up to 6 months , if adjudicated at trial by court-martial; thus, the violation met the requirement of the MILPERSMAN for administrative separation due to the commission of a serious offense.

Based on a review of the evidence and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s misconduct properly satisfied the requirements established for separation based on Misconduct (commission of a serious offense) as the basis for discharge. As such, the NDRB determined there was no impropriety due to an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion with the discharge. Accordingly, relief based on propriety is not warranted .

The Applicant was convicted , twice , in civilian court in the state of Nevada . The first charge s filed against the Applicant w ere for statutory felony sexual seduction of a m inor. Due to extenuating and mitigating circumstances, the state prosecuting attorney reduced the charges to Gross Misdemeanor S exual S eduction of a M inor - the Applicant received a sentence of 3 years probation and a 7-year period of registration as a sex offender. Subsequent to the first civilian criminal arrest , the Applicant was arrested and charged for driving under the influence of alcohol : he was found guilty in court and ordered to community service, alcohol rehabilitation treatment, and a suspension of his driving license. Due to the civilian conviction for the Gross Misdemeanor Sexual Seduction of a Minor, processing for separation was mandatory . The command recognized the same extenuating and mitigating factors as the Prosecuting Attorney did; they notified the A pplicant for all applicable bas e s for separation, but argued for separation based on the Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) related to the DUI vice the Misconduct (Civilian Conviction). The Separation Authority agreed with the command ’ s recommendation , and the Applicant was awarded a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.

Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s service was honest and faithful, but that the civilian convictions were significant negative aspects of his conduct and performance of duties and did outweigh the positive aspects of his service record. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no inequity in the characterization of the A pplicant’s service at discharge. Relief denied.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301706

    Original file (ND1301706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600379

    Original file (ND0600379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Accordingly, I have separated SHSR G_ from the Navy and characterized her service as General under Honorable Conditions. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300973

    Original file (ND1300973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to improve employment opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500274

    Original file (ND0500274.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon review of my Military Service Record I found a Performance Evaluation that had been entered into my record after I had been seperated from Military Service, the Performance Evaluation noted that I had been seperated due to civilian convictions and drug abuse. This Performance Evaluation was not present in my Military Service Record upon my Discarge from the Military. The record contains the Applicant’s notification of administrative board procedure indicating the Applicant was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000811

    Original file (ND1000811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was advised that he was being processed under a dual basis for separation: Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) and Misconduct (Civilian Conviction) in accordance with Articles 1910-142 and 1910-144 of the MILPERSMAN. In accordance with Article 1910-704 of the MILPERSMAN, “ When an administrative board finds that a preponderance of the evidence supports one or more of the reasons for separation and recommends retention, but the Separation Authority recommends...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000962

    Original file (ND1000962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority approved the Command’s recommendation for discharge and designated that the basis for separation would be MISCONDUCT (Serious Offense), having determined that the evidence of record supported both reasons for discharge, but that discharge for MISCONDUCT (Serious Offense) was the more appropriate basis for the Applicant’s administrative separation. The Separation Authority reviewed the evidence of record and the gravity of the miscondcut and directed the Applicant be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01135

    Original file (ND04-01135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Issues to be addressed are (1) Specific Reason for Discharge (2) No Civil Action was taken for alleged Offense (3) Requested FOIA and no response this date The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600843

    Original file (ND0600843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Decisional Issues Equity – Quality of service Equity – Post service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214Letter from A_ M. P_, undated PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00273

    Original file (ND04-00273.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00273 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031201. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 000910: Arrest and Booking Report: Member arrested by Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office for driving Under Influence of Alcohol (DUI).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001369

    Original file (ND1001369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further determined that separation in the Applicant’s case was warranted and that the proposed characterization of servicewas warranted.On 29 April 2004, the Separation Authority directed the Applicant be discharged and that he receive a re-entry code of RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment).The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s discharge package to ensure that the Applicant was afforded all of his administrative rights pursuant to the separation process. The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s...