Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001160
Original file (ND1001160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PRAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100408
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19991023 - 20000214     Active:   20000215 - 20031218 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 200 31219     Age at Enlistment: 22
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20051110      Highest Rank/Rate: PR3
Length of Service : 01 Y ear ( s ) 10 M onth ( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 68
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.2 ( 4 )      Behavior: 1.7 ( 4 )        OTA: 2.70

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (3)

Period of C ONF :

NJP :

- 200 50210 :       Article (Unauthorized absence)
         Article (Failure to obey a lawful general order)
         Awarded : (to E-3) Susp ended:

- 20051012 :       Article (Unauthorized absence , mandatory fitness enhancement program ) , 20050727
         Awarded : (to E-2) Susp ended: (suspend 6 months)

S CM :             SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20050506 :       For Physical Fitness Assessment Failure (PFA) with adverse action [Extracted from OIC’s letter dated 20051026] .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 000215 UNTIL 031218 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 12, effective 3 August 2005 until
16 January 2007, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF PHYSICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT FAILURE .

B. NAVADMIN 180/05, 271525Z JUL 05, PHYSICAL READINESS PROGRAM.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Applicant seeks an upgrade to obtain veteran education benefits.
2.       Applicant contends her discharge was improper due to an ankle injury that prevented her from passing the P hysical F itness A ssessments (PFAs) that led to her separation.

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 06 16             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant identif ied one decisional issue for t he Board ’s consideration . T he Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and proprie ty. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention warning for PFA failure (6 May 2005) and nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications: UA from mandatory fitness enhancement program and one other incident, details NFIR) and Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, a lawful general order, details NFIR). The record also indicated the Applicant failed three PFAs : Fall 2004, cardio and body fat (45%); Spring 2005, cardio and body fat (43%); Fall 2005, cardio and body fat (46%). Based on failing three or more PFAs in the preceding four - year period, the Applicant ’s command processed her for administrative separation in accordance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) section 1910. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure on 21 Oct 2005 , the Applicant waived her right to consult with a qualified counsel, but did elect to submit a written statement al though the statement was not found in the record. Additionally, the Board could not determine whether the Applicant elected or waived her right to General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. The Applicant was separated from the Navy on 10 Nov 2005 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Physical Standards.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to obtain veteran education benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her discharge was improper due to an ankle injury that prevented her from passing the PFAs that led to her separation. The Board conducted a thorough examination of the Applicant’s service records and could not find any evidence that she was experiencing difficulties with her ankle, had ever been placed on light/limited duty, referred for physical therapy , or referred for a local medical board. The record did reveal the Applicant’s inability to maintain physical fitness standards in failing three PFAs: Fall 2004, cardio and body fat (45%); Spring 2005, cardio and body fat (43%); Fall 2005, cardio and body fat (46%). Additionally, her Officer in Charge stated the following in his recommendation for her administrative separation: The Applicant “is militarily unsuitable for retention due to failure to achieve prescribed PFA standards. Member failed multiple body fat composition measurements, physical readiness tests, physical fitness assessments , and fails to attend numerous assigned fitness enhancement program sessions... . Due to member’s multiple failures and unwillingness to participate in programs designed to assist her, I strongly recommend separation under General Under Honorable Conditions . ” Based on all the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s in-service performance and conduct and with no evidence to support the Applicant’s claim, the Board determined this issue to be without merit and did not provide a b a sis for which relief could be granted. Relief d enied.



Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the administrative separation p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101594

    Original file (ND1101594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300849

    Original file (ND1300849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400777

    Original file (ND1400777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB discerned no impropriety and the Applicant’s separation for Physical Standards was proper.However, per Naval Military Personnel Manual Article 1910-170, the characterization of service for separation due to Physical Standards should be Honorable unless a General is warranted. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800018

    Original file (ND0800018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After assuring compliance with MILPERSMAN 1910-170 the separation authority directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of physical standards with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s conduct reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade in his characterization of service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700232

    Original file (MD0700232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and the evidence of post-service conduct did not mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000189

    Original file (ND1000189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, three evaluation and counseling reports reflected the Applicant failed four physical readiness tests from the Spring of 2004 through the Fall of 2005. After considering all the available evidence, in light of the fact the administrative separation package is missing and in consideration of the fact there is no misconduct or substandard performance documented in her record, the Board found that her administrative separation was proper, but the characterization of service was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301812

    Original file (ND1301812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000619

    Original file (ND1000619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901834

    Original file (ND0901834.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PHYSICAL STANDARDS.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900085

    Original file (ND0900085.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: NOT QUALIFIED (NQ) Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20070629 - 20070819Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070820Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20071108Highest Rank/Rate:SR (E-1)Length of Service: Years Months19 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 49EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONE.Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONE Periods of...