Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000863

Original file (ND1000863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100222

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20040124 - 2004112 2     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20041123     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060615      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 25 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 1.33

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20060210 :       Article (Absence without leave, for 10 hours on 26-27 January while inport Hong Kong )
         Article (Failure to obey a lawful order issued by commanding officer USS TARAWA by staying out overnight without liberty chit)
         Awarded : (30 days) (E1) Susp ended:

- 200 6 0607 :       Article (Absence without leave , 4 specifications )
         Specification 1: Absen t himself from a place of duty USS TARAWA (LHA 1) from 0630 - 1230 15 May 2006 , 6 hours.
         Specification 2: On or about 20 May 2006 Seaman Recruit William J. Dunston, without authority, fail to go at time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: the Tijuana, Mexico Border to complete EMI
         Specification 3 : On or about 26 May 2006 Seaman Recruit William J. Dunston, without authority, fail to go at time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: the Tijuana, Mexico Border to complete EMI
         Specification 4 : On or about 27 May 2006 Seaman Recruit William J. Dunston, without authority, fail to go at time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: the Tijuana, Mexico Border to complete EMI

         Awarded : (30 days) Susp ended:

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

         - 20060210:      For NJP for VUCMJ Articles 86 and 92.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 11 June 2008, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 86 and 92.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issue

1. Applicant seeks an upgrade and change in his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Armed Forces .

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 0310 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety . The Applicant’s record of service included NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, five specifications: on 26-27 January while inport Hong Kong , Seaman Recruit William J. Dunston absent himself from a place of duty USS TARAWA (LHA 1) from 0630 - 1230 15 May 2006; on or about 20 , 26 and 27 May 2006 Seaman Recruit William J. Dunston, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, to wit: the Tijuana, Mexico Border , to complete EMI ) and Article 92 ( Failure to obey a lawful order issued by commanding officer USS TARAWA by staying out overnight without liberty chit ) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Nondecisional) Applicant seeks an upgrade and change in his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Armed Forces. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500399

Original file (ND0500399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.040419: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.040419: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27(b), elected to...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500168

Original file (ND1500168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00745

Original file (ND01-00745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

No indication of appeal in the record.880422: Retention Warning from [USS GOLDSBOROUGH (DDG-20)]: Advised of deficiency (CO's NJP of 880406 for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence for a period of 3 hours and thirty five minutes, date of offense 880405, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Your failure to obey a lawful regulation issued by COMNAVBASE SAN DIEGO in regards to the curfew imposed it Tijuana, Mexico, date of offense 880404; violation of UCMJ, Article 107: You did with...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600499

Original file (ND0600499.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20010922 -...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100124

Original file (ND1100124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Automatic upgrades are not given.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501210

Original file (ND0501210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By regulation, members are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service, if they are discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment, unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct, which would merit another characterization. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501377

Original file (ND0501377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 149 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19991028 - 19991107 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19991108...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100997

Original file (ND1100997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01109

Original file (ND04-01109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND04-01109 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040629. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. There I was discharged.
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00826

Original file (ND02-00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND02-00826 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020515, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, general/under honorable conditions or entry level separation (uncharacterized). In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. On May 1997, I was discharge from the U.S. Navy...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000863

Similar Decisions