Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000673
Original file (ND1000673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MSSR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20091228
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20011214 - 20020213     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20020214     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20030926      Highest Rank/Rate: MS3
Length of Service : Y ear M onth s 13 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 36
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.66 ( 3 )     Behavior: 2.66 ( 3 )       OTA: 2.78

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20030731 :      Article , Absence without leave, UA on 20030723 from 0430 – 0450.
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20030910:      Article , Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, disrespectful in language to an MS1 and MS2.
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20030801 :      Following NJP for being in a UA status.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB noted an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:
         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.






Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. The Applicant believes his discharge was inequitable due to personal issues and lack of support from his chain of command .

Decision

Date: 20101020 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, UA on 20030723 from 0430 – 0450 ) and Article 91 ( Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, disrespectful in language to an MS1 and MS2). When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) PARTIAL . The Applicant believes his discharge was inequitable due to personal issues and lack of support from his chain of command . A Page 13 counseling after his first NJP shows that his chain of command did provide specific recommendations to overcome his poor behavior. However, further misconduct led to his discharge from the Navy. In reviewing the Applicant’s record of service, however, the NDRB determined that the frequency and nature of the misconduct resulted in a harsher characterization of service than what is typically given to other Sailors. As a result, the NDRB determined that partial relief to General was warranted. Full relief to Honorable, however, is not warranted, because the Applicant did engage in a pattern of misconduct.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, Reenlistment/RE-code , Employment/Educational Opportunities, Service Benefits and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00610

    Original file (ND02-00610.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00610 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020403, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to completed required service. Issue 1: The Applicant requested the Board upgrade his discharge to honorable based upon the fact that he believes misappropriating a box of crab legs does not justify a General discharge. For the record, the Applicant was found by an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101526

    Original file (ND1101526.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the alcohol rehabilitation failure, command administratively processed for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00766

    Original file (ND04-00766.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00766 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040408. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. * LDF I was punished by civil authorities and the Navy (Double Jeopardy) *LDF My ciritificate of graduation form the treatment I received in Salem Virginia a receipt from the store I was at to establish a time line.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101836

    Original file (ND1101836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to re-enlist in the Armed Forces.2. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation due to a Pattern of Misconduct.The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301260

    Original file (MD1301260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. With four retention warnings and three NJPs during his enlistment, the Applicant met the requirements for administrative separation for Misconduct (Serious Offense) and Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct).Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601004

    Original file (ND0601004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: By a vote of the Characterization shall . Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20040922 (BY CERTIFIED MAIL)Narrative Reason(s): UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN the READY RESERVELeast Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: PRESUMEDDate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700011

    Original file (ND0700011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the characterization of his service at discharge. 20030808: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon the preponderance of evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to civilian conviction and was an alcohol rehabilitation failure, however, by a 2-1 vote recommended retention. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800473

    Original file (ND0800473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Administrative Board voted 3-0 that he had committed misconduct by the commission of a serious offense and recommended his discharge with an overall characterization of service as under other than honorable. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400105

    Original file (ND1400105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201564

    Original file (ND1201564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to reenlist.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans...