Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000116
Original file (ND1000116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-DS3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20091020
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19960 830 - 19960923     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960924     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19981008      Highest Rank/Rate: DS3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 15 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 70
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.00

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 21, effective 1 September 1998 until
19 May 99, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Ordered to sign an incorrect evaluation, which led to discharge.
2. No problems while in the Navy.
Decision

Date: 20 10 1104             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no misconduct that resulted in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. On 29 August 1997, the clinical psychologist at the Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, diagnosed the Applicant with adjustment disorder with depressed mood, alcohol abuse by history, and personality disorder with borderline and antisocial traits. On 5 October 1998, the Applicant was diagnosed with alcohol dependence and personality disorder not otherwise specified with borderline and antisocial traits (severe) and recommended for expeditious administrative separation. Based on the diagnosis, the Applicant ’s command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Co nvening Authority review .

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was ordered to sign an incorrect evaluation, which led to discharge. The Applicant failed to provide the evaluation that he felt was incorrect. The only evaluation found in the Applicant’s record was signed by the Applicant on 8 October 1998, and the only comment was, “Submitted upon the occasion of Petty Officer [Applicant’s] discharge from military service. Per the Commanding Officer, USS WASP (LHD 1), letter dated 6 October 1998, the Applicant was being administratively separated by reason of convenience of the government due to personality disorder, not for an incorrect evaluation. The NDRB determined this issue is without merit.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he had n o problems while in the Navy.
While no evidence o f misconduct was noted in his record , the NDRB found the Applicant had fraudulently enlisted in the Navy. On his Report of Medical History dated 28 August 1996 and his Questionnaire for National Security Positions undated, the Applicant revealed using marijuana five times before enlisting. However, on his medical record dated 29 August 1997, the clinical psychologist stated the Applicant “reported using cannabis on fifty to sixt y occasions which began in his J unior year of high school and ended two months prior to entering the Navy.” On his medical record dated 5 October 1998, the doctor stated the Applicant had a strong history of marijuana, cocaine, LSD, and peyote use prior to entry. Based on the Applicant’s record of service, the NDRB determined the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801835

    Original file (ND0801835.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violations of this policy result in, at a minimum, mandatory processing for an administrative separation which usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial.The command did not pursue a punitive discharge, but opted instead for administrative discharge.While the Applicant may feel his untreated service connected disability...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501161

    Original file (ND1501161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002094

    Original file (ND1002094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge is improper, because it was based on an incorrect diagnosis of personality disorder.2. Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102097

    Original file (ND1102097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ADJUSTMENT DISORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19980715 - 19990526Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19990527Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20020822Highest Rank/Rate: MM2Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 26 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 79EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(4)Behavior:2.8(4)OTA: 3.04Awards and Decorations...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900733

    Original file (ND0900733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902105

    Original file (ND0902105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:I WANT TO JOIN THE RESERVES PLEASE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19981120 - 19981129Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19981130Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19981215Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 56EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001606

    Original file (ND1001606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant wants his Narrative Reason for Separation changed so he can reenlist in the Navy. : (Non-decisional) The Applicant wants his Narrative Reason for Separation changed so he can reenlist in the Navy. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001122

    Original file (ND1001122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority reviewed the evidence of record and evaluation and determined that Personality Disorder was the most appropriate narrative reason for discharge.As such, the NDRB determined no impropriety in the discharge action; the proper narrative reason for separation from the Naval Service was - Convenience of the Government (Personality Disorder). Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801335

    Original file (ND0801335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902462

    Original file (MD0902462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation:From Congress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps...