Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000022
Original file (ND1000022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MRFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090930
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USNR (DEP)        20030722 - 20040217 ELS
 Inactive:         USNR (DEP)        20040916 - 20050122 ELS
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20060519 - 20060716     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060717     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20090717      Highest Rank/Rate: MRFN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 09 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 67
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 2.83

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Period s of UA /CONF : UA: 20071126-20090 717 , 5 99 days ; CONF: NONE

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 23, effective 12 June 2008 until 9 November 2009, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends there were mitigating circumstances affecting his choice to go UA.
2.       The Applicant contends his discharge characterization is inequitable , because he received no reprimands or other legal action prior to entering into a UA status.

Decision

Date : 20 10 1110             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no misconduct resulting in non-judicial punishment or court-martial. The Applic ant was in an unauthorized absence (UA) status for 599 days from November 2007 until July 2009. Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation in absentia . When notified of administrative separation processing on 5 June 2009, using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

The Applicant provided a letter from his father for the NDRB’s consideration.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends there were mitigating circumst ances affecting his choice to go UA. Specifically, the Applicant claims he believed his superiors thought he was inadequate as a S ailor , which led him to decide to go UA. Additionally, the Applicant claims he was depressed and undergoing counseling at the time of his misconduct , which mitigates his actions . After careful examination of the record, the NDRB found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s separation. The Applicant provided no evidence or documentation to support his contention s . The NDRB found the Applicant’s issue to be without merit. Further, the NDRB found the Applicant’s command was unusually lenient in choosing to administratively separate him rather than pursue a special court-martial , which could have resulted in confinement and a punitive discharge characterization. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge characterization is inequitable , because he received no reprimands or other legal action prior to entering into a UA status. The NDRB found the Applicant’s issue to be without merit as well as disingenuous. The Applicant was in a UA status for 599 days and declared a deserter. He was discharged in absentia and acknowledged this by signing his separation notification on 5 June 2009 as he surrendered to Navy authorities. Relief denied.

The NDRB appreciates the letter from the Applicant’s father but can find no mitigation to excuse an unauthorized absence of 599 days from the Applicant’s sworn duty to the United States Navy. As a retired Marine Master Sergeant, he can certainly appreciate the importance of standing by his fellow Sailors and Marines , particularly in a time of war .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000552

    Original file (MD1000552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900635

    Original file (ND0900635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s misconduct outweighs his positive aspects of his military record and was determined not to be an isolated incident.The NDRB concludedthe awarded discharge characterization was appropriate based on his length of service and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201931

    Original file (ND1201931.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101812

    Original file (ND1101812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000456

    Original file (ND1000456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation.Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory.When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative board. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800982

    Original file (ND0800982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214The NDRB did note...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100970

    Original file (ND1100970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As such, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the NDRB can grant relief.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901580

    Original file (ND0901580.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20020814 - 20030713 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030714Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years ExtensionDate of Discharge: 20070316Highest Rank/Rate: MR3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 03 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT: 42Evaluation Marks: Performance: 4.0 (5) Behavior: 3.0 (5) OTA: 3.30Awards and Decorations (per...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301839

    Original file (ND1301839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONF: DISCHARGED IN ABSENTIANJP:SCM:SPCM:Retention Warning Counseling:CIVIL ARREST: - 20050721: Charges: Robbery, breaking and entering, and felonious assaultCC:- 20050721:Offense:Robbery, breaking and entering, and felonious assaultSentence: Entered guilty plea, scheduled for sentencing on 20070221 Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201667

    Original file (ND1201667.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends he has never used “Spice, ” never tested positive for drugs, and received a Good Conduct Medal.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service...