Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002111
Original file (MD1002111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100830
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19970926 - 19971116     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19971117     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 2001060 5      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 19 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 44
MOS: 3051
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /          Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of CONF :

Time Lost (per 214): 20000908-20001208, 92 days

NJP:

- 20001030 :      Article (UA 0730, 20000717 - 0700, 20000818, 31 days)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20010411 :      Article (UA 2145, 20001205 - 0730, 20010201, 57 days)
         Article (Drugs – marijuana)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

CC ARREST:

- Charge: Driving 107 MPH in a 60 MPH zone
Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19990303 :       For my involvement with civil authorities. I was apprehended by Smithfield Police Department for driving 107 MPH in a 60 MPH and served 3 days in Smithfield jail for my actions.

- 20000818 :       For two (2) violations of Article 86, unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty, to wit: Remedial PT on 20000622 and 20000709. I have also been counseled concerning my failure to obey orders from my NCOIC and SNCOIC.


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         “ (31) 2000717-20000817, (57) 20001205-20010131, (92) 20000908-20001208 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present,
Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends that it is inequitable for him to continue to suffer the adverse effects of his Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge .
 2.       The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 929             Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. [The Applicant did not identify any decisional issues to the Board. However, the Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.] The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Unauthorized Absence , : 20000717 - 20000818 for 31 days and 20001205 - 20010201 for 57 days ) and Article ( Wrongful use of controlled substances , : marijuana ). The Applicant had no pre-service drug waiver s for wrongful use of a controlled substance prior to entering the Marine Corps , but acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 25 September 1997 . Based on the Article 112a violation , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel . However, he waived his rights to submit a written statement for consideration by the separation authority and request an administration board .

: ( D ecisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends that it is inequitable for him to continue to suffer the adverse effects of his Other Than Honorable Discharge. He also contends that he was going through a series of difficult problems during his service and this led to his misconduct. The NDRB acknowledges the Applicant’s desire to provide a better life for himself , however, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing a former service member’s ability to provide a better life for himself or his family. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriet y and equity of the discharge. The NDRB also acknowledges that he was going through problems while in the Marine Corps, however, the NDRB does not view personal problems as mitigating serious misconduct, particularly two extended periods of unauthorized absence. There are multiple options available to service members, such as a Navy chaplain, Navy doctors, Fleet and Family Support Centers, or even the Red Cross, to help personnel with personal problems. Relief denied.

: ( D ecisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. Th e Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration. He submitted a personal statement, resume, and documentation indicating that he is in the process of starting his own business. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge . However, there is no law or regulation that provide s that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. He could have provided documentation as specified in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. To warrant an upgrade, the Applicant’s post-service efforts need to be more encompassing. T he Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, Reenlistment/RE-code , Employment/Educational Opportunities, Service Benefits and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101361

    Original file (MD1101361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 November 2008, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Pattern of Misconduct. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400278

    Original file (MD1400278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700204

    Original file (MD0700204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 20010416Basis for Discharge: DUE TO: Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20010420Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (UNDATED) SJA review (date): (20010507/20010529) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, QUANTICO,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801547

    Original file (MD0801547.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion :().The Applicant regrets the mistakes he made while on active duty and desires to upgrade his discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100069

    Original file (ND1100069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant desires to re-enlist in the military. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601125

    Original file (MD0601125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20010501: Applicant from unauthorized absence 0800 (surrendered).20010806: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 0730, 20010301 to 0123, 20010502, Award: Forfeiture of $584.00 for 2 months, extra duty for 45 days. UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS (20020808) SJA review (date): (20020814)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP (20020816)Narrative Reason directed: MISCONDUCT DUE TO A Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700906

    Original file (MD0700906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was diagnosed with "adjustment disorder and borderline Personality Disorder" by competent medical authority at the Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital, Twentynine Palms, CA, and was recommended for administrative separation from the Marine Corps. Issue 3 (Equity): The Applicant is requesting a characterization upgrade and a change to the narrative reason based on his post service accomplishments. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900772

    Original file (MD0900772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400378

    Original file (MD1400378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200418

    Original file (MD1200418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. After considering all the facts and circumstances specific to the Applicant’s case, his command placed him on a six-month period of LIMDU to allow him to receive extensive PTSD counseling/treatment and alcohol rehabilitation program aftercare through his EAOS. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...