Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002023

Original file (MD1002023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100810

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20080426 - 20080504     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080505     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 200811 1 1      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 08 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 55
MOS: 9971
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:
- 20080903 :       Article (Wrongfully use , possession, etc of a controlled substance - M arijuana ( 18 ng /ml )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20080908 :       For A rticle 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, specifically, marijuana (18ng) on 20080812.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

Decisional issue : The Applicant contends that his characterization of service at discharge was overly harsh and was inequitable in consideration of all the other separations occurring and their characterizations of service.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 08 25 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one paragraph 6105 retention-counseling warning and one for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) , specifically, Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance, 1 specification: Marijuana 18 ng/ml as reported by Naval Drug lab msg) . The Applicant ’ s service record contains no other pun i tive or non - pun i tive punishments.

The Applicant entered the service with a pre-service drug waiver for the use of marijuana (20 uses) prior to entering the Marine Corps; he acknowledged, in writing, his complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 24 April 2008 . Based on the violation of Article 112 ( a ) of the UCMJ, processing for administrative separation was mandatory. The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s administrative discharge package . W hen notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to sub mit a written statement, and to request an administrative board hearing.

For additional consideration by the NDRB, the Applicant provided documentation of post-service educational achievements and volunteer efforts. The Applicant also provided a personal statement to the NDRB and a character reference letter for consideration.

(Decisional Issue ) (Equity/Propriety) . T he Applicant contends that his characterization of service at discharge was overly harsh and was inequitable in consideration of all the other separations occurring and their characterizations of service received. The NDRB reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval Service. Violation of Article 112a (drugs- marijuana ) by service policy requires mandatory processing for separation. Violation of Article 112(a) is a serious offense, punishable by punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge, but instead, opted for the more lenient administrative discharge.

The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Marine Corps is challenging. Most Marines serve honorably and therefore earn their honorable discharge. In fairness to those members, Commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Marines receive no higher characterization than is due. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is warranted when a member engages in conduct involving one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the naval service. Based upon available records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Marine Corps . There is no evidence of impropriety, inequity, or procedural irregularities in the Applicant ’ s discharge. The Applicant ’ s misconduct was documented clearly . He acknowledged and waived his rights to legal counsel and an administrative hearing . The Applicant was afforded the appropriate due process during the processing of his case. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary

basis for determining the character of his service, reflected a willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and fell far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. The Applicant ’ s characterization of service - U nder O t her T han H onorable C onditions - was proper , was equitable , and was consistent w ith other discharge s for the same or like offense; as such, the Applicant ’ s service was equitably characterized. Relief as requested is denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the NDRB found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum; specifically, the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002024

Original file (MD1002024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060628 - 20070603Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070604Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20080212Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)08 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:74MOS: 6256Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101037

Original file (MD1101037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s military service record further documents that he is a combat Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800651

Original file (ND0800651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19981117 - 19981220Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19981221Period of enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19990702Length of Service: Years Months11 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 48Highest Rank/Rate:AREvaluation marks:Performance: NA Behavior:NAOTA: NAAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF: NJP:-...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801460

Original file (MD0801460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500255

Original file (MD1500255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301495

Original file (MD1301495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 20090729 SNM was observed operating a POV and in by doing so disregarded restriction policy limits set forth Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100058

Original file (MD1100058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED.The Applicant seeks a change to his narrative reason for discharge to “ Administrative Separation. The characterization of service received was more than appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800885

Original file (ND0800885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Applicant is advised that completion of...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801539

Original file (MD0801539.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902540

Original file (MD0902540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002023

Similar Decisions