Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001968
Original file (MD1001968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100803
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20030626 - 20040217     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20040218     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20051216      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r M on ths 29 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 57
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 3.2 ( 5 ) / 3.8 ( 5 )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle SS GWOTSM NDSM LOA

Periods of CONF : The Applicant was placed in pre-trial confinement on 20050628 . Release date NFIR.

NJP: 1

- 2005061 6 :      Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), 2 specifications
          Specification 1: Failed to inform command of civil underage drinking violation
         Specification 2: Underage drinking
         Article 107 (False official statement), 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Made a false official statement to a captain that he had destroyed a fake ID
         Specification 2: Made a false official statement to a first sergeant that he never had a fake ID nor did he use one to enter a club
          Article 108 (Military property of the United States, damaged his military ID card)
         Article 134 (Possession of a false Virginia ID car d purporting to be over the age of 21)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR Suspended:

SCM: 1

- 20050721 :       Art icle 86 (Absence without leave, 20050626 - 20050627, 2 days)
         Article 134 (Breaking restriction, 20050626)
          Sentence : RIR FOP

SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20050616 :       For failure to obey order or regulation, false official statements, damage to government property, possession of false identification


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade to his RE code.
2.       The Applicant contends youth and immaturity were contributing factors in his misconduct.
 3.       The Applicant contends that the mistakes made by the command during the discharge process warrant an upgrade.
4.       Post-service.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 1020            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one 6105 counseling warning, one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violations o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications ) , Article 107 (False official statement, 2 specifications ) , Article 108 (Military property of the United States, damaged his military ID card) , and Article 134 (Possession of a false Virginia ID care purporting to be over the age of 21) , and one summary court-martial for violations o f the UCMJ: Article 86 (Absence without leave, 20050626 - 20050627, 2 days) and Article 134 (Breaking restriction, 20050626) . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure, the Applicant exercised his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board . The administrative board voted unanimously to separate the Applicant with an U nder O ther T han H onorable C onditions character of service, but recommended that the discharge be suspended. The C onvening A uthority decided not to suspend the administ rative separation .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to his RE code. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his youth and immat urity contributed to making wrong choice s to violate the UCMJ . While the Applicant may belie ve that he made poor decision s due to youth and immaturity, t he record clearly reflects that the Applicant was responsible for his actions and should be held accountable . Further, the record reflects repeated and willful misconduct and that the Applicant was found to have no potential for further service . The NDRB determined the Applicant ’ s youth or age was not a mitigati ng factor in his misconduct. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that the mistakes made by the command during the discharge process warrant an upgrade. The record shows the Applicant’s command reduced him two ranks at NJP. This was an error that was later corrected. However, the Applicant was unaware of the correction and clearly believed he was being treated unfairly by his command. Additionally, the command reduced his P roficiency and C onduct (Pro/Con) marks prior to NJP, as well as after. It was the Applicant’ s rash reaction to these improprieties that led him to go UA for two days. While the Applicant’s actions cannot be fully excused, it is clear he quickly realized his own error and sought to correct it by returning to his command , where he received a summary court-martial for being UA and breaking restriction. The NDRB determined the command’s actions were warranted but overly harsh considering all the circumstances. Relief granted.


: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant requested the NDRB consider post - service conduct as a basis to gain a more thorough understanding of performance and conduct during the period of service under review . The Applicant provided substantial documentation showing significant academic and professional achievements. The Applicant also proved he is financially responsible with an excellent credit score. The NDRB found the Applicant has made great strides in every aspect of his life , thus showing that h is misconduct in service w as a n aberration and not indicative of his overall character. An upgrade to General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted with no change to the na rrative reason for separation.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401204

    Original file (MD1401204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 90 (Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer, 1 specification), Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation; 3 specifications), Article 107(False Official Statement, 2 specifications), and Article 121 (Larceny, 1 specification). Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101185

    Original file (ND1101185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to reenlist into the Armed Forces.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001692

    Original file (ND1001692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901706

    Original file (ND0901706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400951

    Original file (MD1400951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of controlled substances)Article 134 (General Article - Falsified military ID card by altering date of birth)Awarded: Suspended: SCM:SPCM:CC: RETENTION WARNING: NONE Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000374

    Original file (ND1000374.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE).Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300888

    Original file (MD1300888.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Docket No. MD13-00888 «

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901869

    Original file (ND0901869.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information on Post-Service Conduct should he desire a personal hearing before the NDRB in Washington, D.C.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300276

    Original file (ND1300276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20050128 - 20050626Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050627Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20071119Highest Rank/Rate:QMSN / E-3Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 23 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 53EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.33(3)Behavior:2.0(3)OTA: 2.44Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300441

    Original file (ND1300441.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...