Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001951

Original file (MD1001951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100809

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19910610 - 199202 1 2     Active:          199202 13 - 19951211
                                             19951212 - 19981216

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19981217     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20011207      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 21 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 66
MOS: 3043
Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (2) (w/1 star) (Somalia) (w/1 star) JMUA

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 20000504 :      Article (Unauthorized absence, 20000321, 20000323, 20000406, 20000411, 20000413, 20000418, 20000420, 20000425, 20000427, 9 days from the center for drug and alcohol )
         Article (Failed to obey a lawful order, not to drive his POV on post)
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated FOP on 20001005

- 20001005 :      Article (Failed to obey a lawful order, not to access explicit adult internet sites using govt computers or govt internet service provider connections)
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated RIR FOP on 20010329

- 20010402 :      Article (Drugs – THC 158 ng/ml)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:

CC:

- 20000411 :       Offense: DUI
         Sentence : NFIR

CC Arrest:

- 20000211 :       Offense: DUI

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20000211 :       For alcohol related incidents, attend two Unit Prevention Training classes per week beginning 20000215

- 20000211 :       For operating a vehicle with a Alcohol level of 0.19

- 20000218 :       For misconduct involving disrespectful language and unprofessional behavior toward military police officers

- 20010410 :       For illegal drug involvement; marijuana usage indentified through urinalysis confirmed by NAV DRUG LAB JAX MSG 262017z Mar01

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ 09 09 25 ”
         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 920213 UNTIL 981216 ”
         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABL CONDITIONS ”
         “ 20000323, 20000406, 20000411, 20000413, 20000418, 2000402 0 , 20000425, 20000427 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant desires to improve his opportunities for employment.
2.       The Applicant contends his discharge was unjust.

Decision

Date : 2011 0830             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings , for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( , 9 specifications: 9 separate days UA from drug and alcohol treatment ), Article ( , ), and Article ( , : marijuana, 158 ng/ml ). The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana 22 times and for using cocaine 1 time prior to entering the Marine Corps . He acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 10 June 1991 . The Applicant also had a civil conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qual ified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant desires to improve his opportunities for employment. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was unjust. The NDRB disagreed with the Applicant’s contention. The record shows the Applicant was found guilty of several serious offenses including DUI, marijuana use, and failure to obey an order or regulation. Any one of these offenses could have warranted separation with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service. C ertain serious offenses warrant separation from the service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant was notified of separation for v iolation of Article 112a , which requires mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive di scharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. Considering the number of serious offenses, the Applicant was extremely fortunate to have received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service. The NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate . Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700364

Original file (ND0700364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20000427) Separation Authority (date): COMPHIBGRU THREE (20000504)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20000512 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601135

Original file (ND0601135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USNND06-01135Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060829Characterization of Service: Narrative Reason for Separation: Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN1910-106Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: TPU GREAT LAKESApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation: Issues (as summarized by NDRB):1. Elements of Discharge: [REQUESTED BY MEMBER] Discharge Process: Voluntary: Requested by MemberDate...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500078

Original file (MD1500078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901744

Original file (MD0901744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD CONDUCT and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000535

Original file (ND1000535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000636

Original file (MD1000636.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001889

Original file (ND1001889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmentalaffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300822

Original file (ND1300822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101617

Original file (MD1101617.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501023

Original file (MD1501023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030624 - 20040606 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040607 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20090406 Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 00 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: 63 MOS: 0811 Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): Fitness Reports: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001951

Similar Decisions