Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001925
Original file (MD1001925.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100727
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050412 - 20050509     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050510     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20080826      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 17 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 3.5 (NFIR ) / 2.8 ( NFIR )      Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle EX GWOTSM NDSM SSDR ICM

Period of UA : 20071101 - 20071102 [I n hands of civilian authorities, Olean, NY]

NJP: NONE         CC:               Retention Warning Counseling : NONE
SCM: 1
- 20070308 :       Art icle 78 (Accessory after the fact, accessory to the behavior of Lance Corporal F.)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Disobeyed battalion and direct orders by making Marines perform field day at 0430
         Specification 2: Disobeyed a direct order from the battalion commander not to mess with the new Marines in an unprofessional manner
         Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance, cocaine)
         Article 134 (General article, unlawfully entered the barracks room of another Marine)
          Sentence : RIR FOP CONF 30 days (20070308 -20070331, 24 days)

SPCM: 1
- 20071206 :       Art icle 86 (Absence without leave, UA, 20070628 - 20071031, 126 days , ap p rehended )
         Sentence : FOP CONF 55 days (20071103 - 20071206, 34 days) BCD

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
          From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Nondecisional Issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to facilitate reenlist ment in the armed forces.

2.       Decisional Issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge, contending that his discharge was based on a single, isolated incident in what was otherwise honorable service .

Decision

 Date: 20 1 1 1109           Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial, credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant ’ s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial are presumed, by the NDRB, to be established facts. As such, the Applicant ’ s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency.

The Applicant’s service record indicates he entered military service at age 20 on a four-year enlistment contract under the Infantry training option . The Applicant’s enlistment record reflects his entry into military service with waivers to enlistment and induction standards for an adjudicated serious law offense and for pre-service illegal drug use (marijuana) . As a function of his enlistment contract, the Applicant acknowledged his complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning the Illegal Use of Drugs - in writing - on 11 April 2005 . The highest rank achieved by the Applicant during his enlistment was Private First Class . The Applicant’s record of service included S ummary C ourt- M artial for the following o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 78 (Accessory after the fact, accessory to the wrongful behavior of a Lance Corporal) , Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications ) , Article 112a (Wrongful use , possession, etc of a controlled substance - cocaine) , and Article 134 (General A rticle, unlawfully entered the barracks room of another Marine) . Moreover, the Applican t also was subject to trial by S pecial C ourt -M artial for the following violation of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Absence with out leave - absented himself from his unit without authority and did so remain absent from 20070628 - 20071031 ( 126 days ) , absence terminated by civilian law enforcement apprehen sion ). A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant during his trial by Special Court-Martial. The Applicant was tried in accordance with a signed pre-tri a l agreement in which he pled guilty before a judge alone ; in return, the C onvening A uthority agreed to a limitation regarding confinement . Given the facts of the case, the military trial judge awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge, a forfeiture of pay for 2 months, and confinement for a period of 55 days. The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals without assignments of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed. Subsequently, the Navy Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity ordered the Bad Conduct Discharge executed. The Applicant’s final discharge was effected on 26 August 2008.

Nondecisional Issue : The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to facilitate reenlistment in the armed forces . There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of facilitating reenlistment . Regulations limit the NDRB’s review solely to a determination of clemency based on matters of the equity of a discharge when considering a change to a punitive Bad Conduct Discharge. As such, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the NDRB can grant relief.



Decisional Issue: (Clemency/Equity) CLEMENCY NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge, contending that his discharge was based on a n isolated incident in what was otherwise honorable service. The Applicant’s service record documents a period of service of approximately two years and one month prior to his absenting himself from his unit; in this short period of time, he was subject to a S ummary C ourt -M artial for hazing, failure to obey orders, and the illegal use of a controlled substance (cocaine). The v iolation of A rticle 112(a) ( W rongful use, possession, etc of a controlled substance) required mandatory processing for administrative separation by service policy. While pending administrative separation for Misconduct (Drug Abuse) , the Applicant absented himself from his unit, without authority, for 126 days. After 30 days of absence, the Applican t was dropped from his unit roll s and declared a deserter from the Armed Forces. The Applicant remained absent until being apprehended by local civilian law enforcement authorities and returned to military custody. The Applicant’s misconduct documents a pattern of misconduct related to unauthorized absence , illegal drug use, and a general failure to conform to military rules and regulations. Due to the Applicant’s refusal to conform to the expected conduct of a United States Marine , an administrative summary court martial with a pending recommendation for administrative separation, coupled with the need to ensure good order and discipline of the service, the Command referred the final unauthorized absence charge to trial by Special Court Martial. The stated misconduct resulted in the awarding of a punitive Bad Conduct Discharge, a forfeiture of pay, and confinement for a period of 55 days.

D espite a servicemember’s prior record of service , certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Naval Service to maintain proper order and discipline. The pattern of misconduct and general contempt for good order and discipline and illegal drug use is not minor misconduct and supports the findings of the court - martial in awarding a Bad Conduct Discharge. The NDRB found that the evidence of record, along with the Applicant’s statement, did not contain sufficient mitigating or extenuating factors to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge characterization was awarded. Given the short period of the Applicant’s service, coupled with the repetitive and extensive nature of the misconduct, ended only by apprehension, the NDRB agreed unanimously that the punishment, as awarded, was warranted and was equitable; relief in the form of clemency is not warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that clemency was not warranted. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100022

    Original file (MD1100022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With no Bad Conduct Discharge remaining due to clemency, the Convening Authority processed the Applicant for an administrative discharge pursuant to paragraph 6210.6 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s documentation, summary of service, service record entries, results of trial by special court martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001502

    Original file (ND1001502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Convening Authority took action on the adjudged sentence on 15 September 2003, specifying, “ Except for the Bad Conduct Discharge, the sentence is approved and will be executed .” Based on a review of the record of trial and all supporting documentation, the NDRB determined that the Convening Authority intended to state that “ The Sentence is approved, and except for the Bad Conduct Discharge, will be executed .” Not noticing the error in the Convening Authority’s specified actions, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100244

    Original file (MD1100244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Issue 1: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to facilitate access tomedical disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs.Issue 2: The Applicant contends that his misconduct of record was the result of stress from depression and anxiety related to personal relationship problems, which warrants consideration as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001752

    Original file (MD1001752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, relief is denied Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the verbatim transcript record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE, andthe narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101141

    Original file (MD1101141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100247

    Original file (MD1100247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100206

    Original file (MD1100206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s enlistment record reflects his entry into military service with a waiver to enlistment and induction standards for pre-service illegal drug use (marijuana) and for exceeding the Marine Corps height/weight standards. Issue 2: (Decisional) (Clemency/Equity)CLEMENCY NOT WARRANTED. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002216

    Original file (MD1002216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Time served in confinement: 20030709 - 200300711 [IHCA], 20030712 - 20030827 [pre-trial confinement], and 20030828 - 20030920 [confinement] - 72 days total time served.CC: NONERetention Warning Counseling:NONE Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100008

    Original file (ND1100008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201004

    Original file (MD1201004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident that occurred years before his discharged date with no other adverse actions in his record.Despite a member’s record of service, certain serious offenseswarrant separation from the Naval services to maintain proper order and discipline.Before going to a Special Court-Martial, the Applicant had received a retention warning and had been found guilty at NJP for violating UCMJ Article 91. Clemency denied.Summary: After a...