Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000489

Original file (MD1000489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20091127

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: MEDICAL

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20011116 - 20020818     Active: 20020819 - 20021029 ELS
                           20040929 - 20041018
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20041019     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20041116      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 28 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 4 8
MOS: 9900
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 and Present, paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1.       The Applicant contends his record should reflect the National Defense Service Medal.
2.       The Applicant contends he should have a medical discharge as evidenced by the Veterans Administration (VA) assigning him a 40% disability rating.
3. The Applicant believes he deserves an Honorable characterization of service for his time served.

Decision
Date: 20 1 1 0113          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no misconduct resulting in non-judicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the recommendation of competent medical authority, the Applicant ’s command administratively processed for separation due to having a condition, not a disability . When notified of a dministrative separation processing , the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant contends his record should reflect the National Defense Service Medal. The NDRB does not have the authority to render a decision on this issue. T his issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. T he Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he should have a medical discharge as evidenced by the VA assigning him a 40% disability rating. The record shows the Applicant was separated based on the recommendation of competent medical authority for a condition no t considered t o be a disability, specifically , lower back pain. The VA renders decisions and disability ratings independently from the military. The NDRB and the United States Marine Corps are not bound by VA decisions or precedent. The Applicant’s separation and notification procedure was proper, equitable , and in accordance with applicable policies and regulations. The NDRB found the narrative reason for separation assigned to be the most appropriate and found no change to be warranted.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes he deserves an Honorable characterization of service for his time served. The Applicant served 28 days on active duty and was in an entry level status since he had served less than 180 days . The Applicant was separated under paragraph 6203 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN) due to a cond ition not considered by medical authority to be a disability. MARCORSEPMAN guidance for c haracterization of s ervice states that characterization of service for a Marine separated under the provisions of paragraph 6203, convenience of the government , is either honorable or general (under honorable conditions) as determined by the Marine's service record unless the Marine is in an entry level status. Service will be uncharacterized for a Marine in an entry level status. The NDRB found Uncharacterized to be the correct characterization in the Applicant’s case. No change is warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000345

Original file (MD1000345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.With regard to the Uncharacterized discharge listed in Block 24 of the DD-214, the Board found that the characterization of service was correct based on the provisions mandated under chapter 6 (paragraph 6203) of the Marine Corps Separations and Retirement Manual, which detail the procedures for administrative separation of Marines due to a condition not a disability that have less than 180 days of...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300116

Original file (MD1300116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A change to the narrative reason for separation is not warranted, because refusal of medical treatment is grounds for discharge for a Condition, Not a Disability.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201869

Original file (MD1201869.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201923

Original file (MD1201923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical-related reasons. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201270

Original file (MD1201270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200658

Original file (MD1200658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

If examination by a medical officer confirms that the Marine is suffering from a physical condition apparently beyond the individual’s control and indicates that the condition is not a disability, initiate separation proceedings per paragraph 6303 or 6304.” Competent medical authority at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, San Diego determined his multiple stress fractures were a condition, not a disability and properly initiated separation proceedings.His separation code of JFV1 in Block 26 of his...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200930

Original file (MD1200930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

A subsequent determination by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)that the Applicant warranted disability compensation does not warrant a change to the narrative reason for discharge. Therefore, the NDRB determined an upgrade to Honorable was warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301136

Original file (MD1301136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Per the MARCORSEPMAN, Condition Not a Disability is the correct narrative reason for separation for discharge due to a physical condition that precludes further military service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101995

Original file (MD1101995.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Reenlistment/RE-code : Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301494

Original file (MD1301494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20080828 - 20081214Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20081215Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20121116Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)02 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:64MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000489

Similar Decisions