Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000436

Original file (MD1000436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20091124

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20030328 - 20030414     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20030415    Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20040716      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 63
MOS: 9911
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle NDSM

Period of CONF : 20040317-20040415 ( 29 days )

NJP:
- 20040223 :       Article 86 ( U nauthorized absence from appointed place of duty 2130, 20040207 to 1500, 20040208)
         Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation, to wit: not to leave base while in training )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

- 20040423 :       Article 86 ( Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty 0730, 20040421 to 1840, 20040422)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

SCM:
- 20040419 :       Art icle 86 ( Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty - 2 specifications )
         Article 134: (Break restriction on divers occasions between 20040309-20040316)
         Sentence :

SPCM:

CC: Arrested by civilian authorities f o r driving under the influence of alcohol.

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20040218 :       For alcohol - related incident, specifically DUI (.08 BAC.)
- 20040223 :       For battalion NJP for violation of A rticles 86, 92, and 111
- 20040419 :       For violation of A rticles 134 and 86 , specifically, unauthorized absence, breaking restriction and other minor violation of the UCMJ
- 20040526 :       For refusal of Medical Treatment for diagnosed Substance Abuse and/or Dependence

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. T he Applicant contends his characterization and narrative reason of discharge is inequitable and unjust.

Decision

Date: 20110315 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty - 2 specifications), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation, to wit: not to leave base while in training) , and Summary Cour t-Martial (SCM) for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty - 2 specifications) and Article 134 (Break restriction on divers occasions).
Additionally, the Applicant was arrested by civilian authorities f o r driving under the influence of alcohol. Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised rights to consult with a qualified counsel, but waived his rights to submit a written statement for considerati on by the separating authority and to request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) PARTIAL . The Applicant contends his characterization and narrative reason of discharge is inequitable and unjust , because he was suffering from a mental health issue (Bi-Polar Disorder), the onset of which began in the Marine Corps. The NDRB carefully examined the Applica nt’s medical and service records to consider the extent to which a mental health issue might affect his performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition, nor the medical treatment given or not given to the Applicant to be of sufficient nature to exculpate the Applicant’s misconduct. The NDRB took into consideration the Applicant’s mental status as diagnosed after he was discharged from the Marine Corps and found that partial mitigation was in order. However, the NDRB did not find that the Applicant’s mental state completely mitigated his misconduct and determined that he was responsible for his actions and should have been held accountable. A fter a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s se rvice. The Board’s vote was 4-1 that the character of the discharge shall change to General (Under Honorable Conditions), but by unanimous vote, the narrative reason for discharge shall not cha nge. Partial r elief granted. Full relief was not granted, because the NDRB found that the re should be some accountability for the misconduct .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Revie ws and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901960

Original file (MD0901960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Clemency denied.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in consideration if a case warrants clemency. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Bad Conduct Discharge”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided, clemency would be inappropriateSummary:After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000859

Original file (ND1000859.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600970

Original file (MD0600970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Equity – Post Service Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20020711 - 20030707Active: None Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030708Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20040419 Length of Service: 00Yrs 09 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Time Lost During This Period: 287Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 43MOS:9900Highest Rate/Rank:PvtPerformance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):Proficiency / Conduct: N/A Extracted...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900088

Original file (ND0900088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001591

Original file (MD1001591.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant completed his required active service with the Marine Corps and was discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization based on his average Proficiency and Conduct (Pro/Con) marks. This certificate has no relation or bearing on his active service, for which he properly and equitably received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900003

Original file (MD0900003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the determining if clemency is warranted. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Bad Conduct Discharge”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided clemency is not warranted.Should the Applicant feel his post service conduct becomes substantial enough to warrant a personal appearance,...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801920

Original file (ND0801920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: NONEActive: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20021219Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20050629Highest Rank/Rate:AEANLength of Service: Inactive: 00 Years 06Months15 DaysActive: Years Months25 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 75EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200429

Original file (ND1200429.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101081

Original file (MD1101081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant could have...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801611

Original file (ND0801611.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20021218 - 20030701Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030702Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20050727Length of Service: Years Months26 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 48Highest Rank/Rate:ANEvaluationMarks:Performance:2.0(1) Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 1.67Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):SSDR NDSM GWOTEMPeriod...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000436

Similar Decisions