Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000340

Original file (MD1000340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20091119

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19980925 - 19990526     Active: 19990527 - 20021014 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20021015     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20070927      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 12 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 43
MOS: 0231
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle x 2 JSCM x 3 JMU A NUC
Periods of UA / CONF :

SCM:
- 20070712 :      Article , Failure to obey an order or regulation, 3 specifications.
         Specification 1: d ereliction of duty, on 20070108 did willfully fail to properly perform his duties as the Assistant SACO and Urinalysis Coordinator.
         Specification 2: wrongfully engaged in a personal relationship with a corporal and a lance corporal.
         Specification 3: violated Military Protective Order (MPO) issued by his commanding officer.
         Sentence: RIR

NJP:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:
- 20050202:      For domestic assault due to an altercation with his wife.
- 20070821 :       For notification of the commander’s intent to administratively separate the Applicant.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits.
2. The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because it was based on an isolated incident .
3. The Applicant contends that he was only trying to help out a Marine with a drug problem.
3. The Applicant believes his discharge was improper , because he was held past his EAS .

Decision

Date: 2010 1202 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for of the UCMJ: Article 92, (Failure to obey on order or regulation, 3 specifications: specification 1 : dereliction of duty, on 20070108 did willfully fail to properly perform his duties as the Assistant SACO and Urinalysis Coordinator ; specification 2 : wrongfully engaged in a personal relationship with a corporal and a lance corporal ; specification 3 : violated Military Protective Order (MPO) issued by his commanding officer). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised right to c onsult with a qualified counsel but waived his right to request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade for service benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because it was based on an isolated incident. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service to maintain good order and discipline. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by for violations of UCMJ Article 92. Violations of Article 92 a re considered serious offenses and are often punished by a B ad C onduct or D ishonorable discharge after adjudication at a Special or General Court-Martial . The Applicant’s command opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. Relief d enied.

Issue 3: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED The Applicant contends that he was only trying to help out a Marine with a drug problem. OPNAVINST 5350.4D states: “All personnel are responsible for reporting known or suspected incidents of drug abuse.” The Applicant was aware of two Marines who had been using marijuana at his residence and failed to report the violations and later allowed one of the Marines access to the SACO locker to remove a urine sample. Relief denied.

Issue 4 : (Decisional) (Propriety) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED The Applicant believes his discharge was improper , because he was held past his EAS. Paragraph 1008.1 .b of the Marine Corps Separation Manual states: “ Those personnel to whom jurisdiction has attached by commencement of action with a view to trial, as by apprehension, arrest, confinement, or
filing of charges, before release from active duty, may be retained on active duty. Once jurisdiction has been so attached, it continues for purposes of trial, sentence, and punishment.” The Board determined the Applicant’s command was proper in retaining him until adjudication of the offenses and completion of the punishment. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, Reenlistment/RE-code , Employment/Educational Opportunities, Service Benefits and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400139

Original file (MD1400139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060119 - 20060124Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060125Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110730Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:52MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801825

Original file (ND0801825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19910228 - 19910423Active: 19910424 – 19950624 HONORABLE 19950625 – 20010419 HONORABLE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010420Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20071016Highest Rank/Rate:E-6Length of Service: 16Years Months23 DaysEducation Level:12AFQT:...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300059

Original file (ND1300059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000649

Original file (ND1000649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400264

Original file (MD1400264.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), acting under the authority granted to him by the Secretary of the Navy, approved the recommendation for separation presented by the Applicant’s command.The Applicant provided evidence of multiple requests mast applications during this period of service. There is no indication in the evidence of record or in the documentation submitted by the Applicant that the Applicant was recommended for or processed for a medical board...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801898

Original file (MD0801898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s medical record shows the Applicant was seen by medical personnel regularly, especially between December 2006 and June 2007 when his NJP and SCM were held, for a variety of reasons including a required mess duty physical, physical ailment and mental health treatment. Less than a week into his restriction, Private Greene drank alcohol (despite being on restriction), attempted to drive a vehicle while intoxicated, and was in a car accident before he reached the exit of the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900718

Original file (MD0900718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

You knowing and willingly accepted an unauthorized phone call thus violating a Military Protection Order. Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500321

Original file (MD1500321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901073

Original file (MD0901073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400623

Original file (MD1400623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000340

Similar Decisions