Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902629

Original file (ND0902629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LT, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090923

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: SECNAVINST 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS)

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive: USN R ( DEP )     19 950818 - 199 60303      Active: 19960304 – 1998 0331 HON
                  Active: 19980401 – 20010419 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Appointment : 20010420     Age: 25
Years Contracted : Indefinite
Date of Discharge: 20090731       Highest Rank : LT
Length of Service: 08 Year(s) 03 Month(s) 11 D ay(s)
Education Level: 12       AFQT: 93
Officer’s Fitness reports: Available
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      P istol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20081114 :      Article (Failure to obey a lawful general order)
         Article 133 (Conduct unbecoming of an Officer/Gentleman)
         Article 134 (Adultery)
         Awarded: Punitive letter of reprimand Suspended: None

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling:

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214
The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 960304 UNTIL 010419 ”
         Type of Separation, should read: “RESIGNED
         “ GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS ) ”
         “ BKM "
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1. Discharge was inequitable , because it was based on an isolated incident.

Decision
Date: 20 10 11 10 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included non-judicial punishment for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 ( Failure to obey a lawful general order), Article 133 (Conduct unbecoming an officer), Article 134 (Adultery). It included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, summary court-martials, or special court-martials. The Applicant submitted a q ualified r esignation from Naval Service requesting a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his discharge was based on an isolated incident and that his entire record of service warrants consideration. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the N avy to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Articles 92 , 133, and 134 are such offenses. F ail ure to obey a general order and A d ultery can result in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum , a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. Conduct unbecoming an officer carries the same maximum sentence if adjudicated and awarded by a general court-martial. His command chose not to adjudicate the violations through court-martial proceedings but opted instead to use non-judicial punishment , which has a more lenient maximum punishment. The Applicant was f ound guilty of violating A rticles 92, 133, and 134 of the UCMJ, which marred his service record . He subsequently submitted a qualified resignation , which (per the MILPERSMAN ) is one submitted by a commissioned officer in response to administrative separation processing . Although h e could have requested a n Honorable characterization , he only request ed a General (Under Honorable Conditions ). Had it not been for the Applicant’s misconduct and the possibility of receiving a lesser characterized discharge , it is un likely that he would have submitted a resign ation . The S ecretary of the Navy approved the separation with a General characterization as well as considered the circumstances pertaining to the qualified resignation and assigned M isconduct as the reason for separation. Based on the serious nature of the offenses committed by the Applicant , t he NDRB determined the assigned N arrative R eason for S eparation appropriate and accurate. The Board found the Applicant's discharge proper and equitable . Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 15 December 2005 until Present, establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201130

Original file (ND1201130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300351

Original file (ND1300351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301712

Original file (ND1301712.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USN (Nurse Candidate Program) 20040108 - 20050421 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment: 20050422Age: 20Years Contracted: Indefinite Date of Discharge: 20091031 Highest Rank: LTJGLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 10 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: NFIROfficer’s Fitness reports: AvailableAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol Periods of UA/CONF: NJP:-...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902093

Original file (MD0902093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 15 December 2005 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 Mar 97. The Applicant contends he was denied due process before he was issued a stigma-holding discharge and wants a non-stigma-holding separation...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101011

Original file (MD1101011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Secretary of the Navy...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200814

Original file (ND1200814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Accordingly, the NDRB found the Applicant’s issue to be without merit and did not provide a basis for relief. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant is not eligible for any further reviews from the NDRB. ” Additional Reviews : After...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101203

Original file (MD1101203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s testimony, summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT.The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200470

Original file (MD1200470.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700901

Original file (MD0700901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 20001110: Applicant signs Marine Corps policy concerning fraternization. Awarded –Written Reprimand.20060926: Applicant issued Punitive Letter of Reprimand.20060929: Applicant submitted a request for 20061017: ,3d Marine Aircraft Wingforwarded Report of Non-judicial Punishment to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.20061017: Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wingforwarded Applicant’s request for...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801407

Original file (ND0801407.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USN(US Naval Academy)Start date NFIR - 20040527Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment:20040528 Years Contracted: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20070131Length of Service: Years Months04 Days Education Level: Age at Enlistment:Highest Rank: Officer’s Fitness reports:the Board for review.Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONE Discharge Process...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902629

Similar Decisions