Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902563

Original file (ND0902563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MS3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090916

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620200[PERSONALITY DISORDER]

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19940110 - 19940124     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19940125     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19960307      Highest Rank/Rate: MS3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 13 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 67
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.3 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.3 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.27
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):
Periods of UA : 0500 – 1500, 19950212      C ONF :

NJP :
- 19950130 :      Article (Absence without leave – leaving place of duty)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation – drunkenness/incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 19951122 :      Article (Absence without leave), 3 specifications
         Article (Missing movement)
         Article (Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer – willful disobedience)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19960117 :      For completion of Level III alcohol rehabilitation.
- 19950130 :      For violations of articles 86 and 92 resulted in NJP held this date.
- 19950523 :      For violation of article 86 .
- 19951122 :      For violations of articles 86, 87, and 91 resulted in NJP held this date.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1. Discharged for medical and not for disciplinary reasons.
2. Post-service conduct warrants consideration.

Decision
Date: 20 10 1021 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included four NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and two nonjudicial punishments for violations o f the Uniform Code of Mili tary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Absence without leave, 4 specifications), Article 87 (Missing movement), Article 91(Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, willful disobedience), and Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, drunkenness/incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor). On 31 October 1995, the Applicant was diagnosed with alcohol dependence and personality disorder not otherwise specified (NOS). On 25 November 1995 , the Applicant’s diagnosis was adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and personality disorder NOS. Based on his diagnosis, the Applicant’s command administratively processed him for separation. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was discharged for medical and not for disciplinary reasons. Pursuant to Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s), the characterization of discharge is Honorable, unless an Entry Level Separation or General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance outweighs positive aspects of the member’s military record. Based on the Applicant’s record of misconduct, the NDRB determined the awarded characterization of service was warranted. Relief denied.

Issue 2: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant stated he is currently incarcerated in prison, but is in the process of having his conviction overturned and dismissed. (Based on the West Virginia Division of Corrections website, the Applicant is in the Mount Olive Correctional Center for one count of child sexual abuse by parent, consent immaterial.) The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided several letters of reference and documentation regarding his education , training , and employment . The NDRB determined the Applicant’s post-service conduct was not sufficient to form a positive basis of relief and an upgrade to Honorable would not be appropriate. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, and medical r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 23 June 1996, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01134

Original file (ND99-01134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Thank you very much, (applicant) MS3, USN.930826: Commanding officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. The second psychologist conducted a separate evaluation and also concluded that MS3 (applicant) suffered from a severe personality disorder that warranted immediate separation. ...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900127

Original file (ND0900127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020518 - 20021002Active:20021003 - 20060803 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060804Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070329Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.50Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00174

Original file (ND99-00174.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND99-00174 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The board voted unanimously to change the reason for discharge to reflect personality disorder.In the applicant’s issue, the Board found no basis for relief. The discharge was equitable and correctly characterizes the applicant’s service and separation based upon a personality disorder.
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800457

Original file (ND0800457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: MEDICAL CONDITION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19860116 - 19861027Active: 19861028 – 19900830 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19900831Period of enlistment:4 Years+ 2 month extensionDate of Discharge:19931021Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths21 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 78Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.4 (6) Behavior:3.4 (6)OTA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01393

Original file (ND03-01393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND03-01393 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030820. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902113

Original file (ND0902113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant wants his narrative reason for separation changed to “Good of the Service.” The NDRB notes “ Good of the Service” is not an authorized enlisted personnel separation code.As noted in Issue 1, the NDRB determined the Applicant was properly diagnosed with a personality disorder at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002053

Original file (ND1002053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization of a discharge solely on the issues of receiving veterans benefits and enhancing employment opportunities, and these issues do not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01351

Original file (ND03-01351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Z_ Z_ (Applicant). Applicant was considered self-destructive and a continuing risk of harm to self or others.960422: DD Form 214: Applicant's discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a personality disorder in accordance with NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.Applicant’s discharge package missing from service record.
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800207

Original file (ND0800207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500712

Original file (ND1500712.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902563

Similar Decisions