Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902454
Original file (ND0902454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090901
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630300 [UNSAT PERFORMANCE]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19960228 - 19961008     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19961009     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20000307      Highest Rank/Rate: SHSN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 02 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 70
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 1.4 ( 5 )      Behavior: 1.0 ( 5 )        OTA: 1.63

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 19980604 :      Article (UA), 2 specifications
         Specification 1: 19980510
         Specification 2: 19980511
          Article (Disobeying a lawful order)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19980617 :       For failure of the Physical Readiness Test.
- 19990806 :       For failure to understand and comply with military standards, specifically your repeated failure to maintain the high standards of uniform appearance as required by United States Navy Uniform Regulations; failure to maintain personal hygiene standards; failure to provide customer service in a professional manner; failure to render proper military courtesy; failure to perform job assignments satisfactorily; and failure to go to appointed place of duty at the time prescribed.

         - 19990809 : For failure to follow proper routing and communication procedures.

-        20000105: For reporting late for duty
-        20000124: For having an unauthorized visitor in her barracks room after hours on 2 and 23 January 2000.
-        20000207: For personal appearance and personal hygiene.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18 effective 12 December 1997 until 21 August 2002, Article 1910-156, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Released early after having a child , would have been forced to give up her child if she had to deploy because she was a single mother, and w as not able to properly fit in her uniforms.

Decision

Date: 20 10 1001             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : VA

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included six NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings or Submarine Base Bangor Record of Counseling 1070/2 forms and one nonjudicial punishment for violations of the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 2 specifications: 1 day each) and Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation). Per her commanding officer’s letter dated 8 March 2000, the Applicant received four graded performance ev aluations with trait averages o f 1.83, 2.33, 1.33, and 1.17, and required numerous counseling sessions for poor performance, personal behavior, personal hygiene, and uniform standards. Based on the Applicant’s inability to understand and comply with military standards, her command administratively processed her for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived her rights to submit a written statement and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review , but elected to consult with a qualified counsel.
Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she was released early after having a child and would have been forced to give up her child if she had to deploy because she was a single mother and was not able to properly fit in , or afford new, uniforms after giving birth . The Applicant provided no documentation to support her contention. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001335

    Original file (ND1001335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issue: The Applicant contends that her characterization of service at discharge was inequitable as it was based on one isolated incident in over 35 months of otherwise honorable service, she was discharged due to parenthood - not for misconduct, and her performance and conduct of record warrant a characterization of Honorable. The Applicant’s service record documents...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901436

    Original file (MD0901436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100632

    Original file (MD1100632.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service includedtwelve 6105 counseling warningsfor missed drills from February 2007 to March 2008.Based on the Applicant’s failure to participate, her command administratively processed her for separation. In the absence of any evidence to support the Applicant’s issue, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100201

    Original file (ND1100201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she was told that she would receive an Honorable discharge six months after her separation.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801727

    Original file (ND0801727.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She waived her right to an administrative hearingand representation by qualified military or civilian counsel.The Applicant’s allegation that the command threatened her with a dishonorable discharge is without merit since she had an opportunity and did consult with counsel before waving her right to an administrative board.Based on the seriousness of the offenses committed and the lack of mitigating circumstances, the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901857

    Original file (ND0901857.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101633

    Original file (ND1101633.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. No other narrative reason...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301822

    Original file (ND1301822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends she was dealing with the stress of the death of a child.The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging and dealing with the loss of a child is extraordinarily challenging.There was evidence in the Applicant’s medical record, as well as her Commanding Officer’s comments on the Applicant’sRecommendation for Administrative Separation to Commander Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, documenting that she lost her child a little more than a month prior to her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000964

    Original file (ND1000964.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The NDRB voted unanimously...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200982

    Original file (ND1200982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Separation Authority determined the Applicant’s “psychiatric condition affected her potential for performance of expected duties and responsibilities while on active duty and poses a risk if she is retained in the naval service.” Based on the Applicant’s length of service and her diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, the NDRB determined the assigned characterization of service and narrative reason for separation of service were proper and...