Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902321
Original file (ND0902321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090818
Characterization of Service Received: (entry level separation)
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (OTHER)
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20060512 - 20060628     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060629     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060727      Highest Rank/Rate: AR
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 29 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 36
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR   OTA: NFIR
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- Date NFIR :      Not eligible for reenlistment due to ASMO code 311.
Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL ”
         “ UNCHARACTERIZED ”
         “ FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Wants type of separation changed on his DD Form 214.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0311    Location: Washington D.C .       R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant did not identify any decisional issues to the Board. However, the Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances which led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning , and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. While in boot camp, the Applicant was diagnosed with Tourette’s disorder, which existed prior to service (EPTS); anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS), EPTS; and by history, depressive disorder, NOS, EPTS. This diagnosis wa s grounds to effect an erroneous enlistment. However, the Applicant failed to disclose his use of Zoloft prior to service, which is grounds to effect a fraudulent enlistment. Based on the diagnosis and failure to disclose pres-service psychotropic drug use, the Ap plicant ’s command administratively processed him for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Co nvening Authority (GCMA) review .

Issue 1 : ( Nond ecisional) The Applicant wants block 23, type of separation, on his DD Form 214 changed to “Entry Level Separation.” The NDRB considers this an administrative issue, but did review the Applicant’s DD Form 214 and found Block 23 is correct as issued. Per BUPERSINST 1900.8B, “Entry Level Separation” is not a valid entry for block 23. In addition, t he Applicant marked on his DD Form 293 that he wanted to change his characterization to Honorable and change his narrative reason for separation, but did not specify a new narrative reason. For the Applicant’s information, an u ncharacterized characterization of service is appropriate for servicemembers with less than 180 days of service and is used in cases of either an entry level separation or a void enlistment. The Applicant only had 29 days of service. The Applicant was notified of administrative separation processing for both erroneous enlistment and fraudulent enlistment, and the separation authority made the decision to separate him for fraudulent enlistment. The NDRB determined the awarded characterization of service and narrative reason for separation were warranted and appropriate.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, medical and r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 3 May 2005 until 16 May 2008, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901811

    Original file (ND0901811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900633

    Original file (ND0900633.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901175

    Original file (ND0901175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    See the Addendum paragraph, Reenlistment/RE-code , for more information.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews :...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900380

    Original file (ND0900380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Besides the Applicantsstatement on the DD Form 293, she provided a character reference, congressional correspondence and a recent psychiatric diagnosis of her current condition, stating there is no evidence of a diagnosis for personality disorder.The Board applauds the Applicant for her success in life now and wishes her the best in future endeavors.Although the Applicant has made great strides over-coming difficult situations and stressors in her life, the Board has determined that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801919

    Original file (ND0801919.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801887

    Original file (ND0801887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant has requested an upgrade to his discharge characterization to “Honorable”. For the edification of the Applicant, an “Uncharacterized” description shall be used when separation is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty service unless separation for misconduct, fraudulent enlistment, or homosexual conduct is authorized and when characterization of “Under Other Than Honorable Conduct” is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900887

    Original file (ND0900887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500990

    Original file (ND1500990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s record of service included a medical diagnosis of Vertigo, which existed prior to entry into service, on 17 December 2012 while still in entry level training for the United States Navy. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100152

    Original file (ND1100152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” On 9 Oct 2001, the Branch Head for the Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital, Jacksonville FL sent a memo to the Applicant’s Commanding Officer that included the following: “AXIS II - Personality Disorder NOS with Borderline features, severe, EPTE (existed prior to entry)…unsuitable for continued military service…considered potentially dangerous based on past history of suicide ideation and suicide attempt requiring hospitalization…recommend expeditious administrative separation. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900408

    Original file (ND0900408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While he may feel his youth was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidencedoes not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his misconduct or should not be held accountable for his actions due to youth or immaturity.Based on the diagnosis from the recruit Psychologist, the Board has determined the awarded discharge characterization and narrative reason were appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.For the edification of the Applicant, an...