Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902211
Original file (ND0902211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MMFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090805
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020214 - 20020422     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20020423     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060317      Highest Rank/Rate: MM3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 25 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 68
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.50 (4)     Behavior: 2.25 (4)        OTA: 2.54

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF : UA: 20050917-20051003 ( 17 days ); 20051125-20051127 ( 3 days ); 20051205-20060119 (45 days ) CONF:

NJP :
- 20060213 :      Article (U nauthorized absence 20051205-20060119, 45 days)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :

SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ MISCONDUCT ”
         “ 20050917-20051003; 20051125-20051127 ; 20051205-20060119 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.





Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                  Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until 11 June 2008,
Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (Unauthorized absence for more than 30 days).


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1 . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his misconduct was due to mental health issues.

Decision

Date : 2010 0810 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized absence for 45 days). Additionally, the Applicant had two periods of lost time , shortly before his 45 - day UA, totaling 20 days. Based on the serious offense committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his misconduct was due to mental health issues. The Applicant was seen throughout his career for mental health issues, which w ere diagnosed and properly treated. In itially, the Applicant was having family problems (financial, legal, marital ) and was seen by medical staff who diagnosed him with adjustment disorder, which disqualified him from submarine duty. He continued treatment and was transferred to the surface fleet, where his mental health status improved per the medical staff’s statement (13 April 2005) that his adjustment disorder has been completely resolved and he is fit for full duty , including sea duty. In the Fall of 2005, it appears the Applicant was again diagnosed with adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, alcohol dependence ( mild to moderate ) , and borderline personality disorder. It was recommended that the Applicant be expeditiously discharged after he complete d Level II t reatment for his alcohol dependence issue . Per the commanding officer’s comments , “His TAD and unauthorized absence prevented immediate execution of that discharge . ” The commanding officer recommended that the Applicant be discharged from the Naval Service for personality disorder and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Thus, the Applicant was separated due to misconduct for commission of a serious offense . The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s discharge was proper and warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews , Medical Conditions and Misconduct, Service Benefits and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800823

    Original file (MD0800823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board determined the characterization of service that he is being upgraded to, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, is an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300173

    Original file (ND1300173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19910628 - 19910806Active: 19910807 - 19970430 HON USN 19970501 - 20000601 HON USN 20000602 - 20030914 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030915Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070529Highest Rank/Rate:AD1Length of Service:Years Months15 DaysEducation Level:AFQT:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102024

    Original file (ND1102024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined the narrative reason for separation of Personality Disorder was improperly assigned. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.The Applicant remains eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901747

    Original file (MD0901747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the record of evidence reflected the Applicant met the requirements for involuntary administrative separation for the convenience of the Government by reason of personality disorder. The Board voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of the discharge, but the narrative reason for the discharge shall remain as issued.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500358

    Original file (ND1500358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700150

    Original file (MD0700150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - FOP ($849.00) for (1 month); RIR (E-1); Confinement (30 days).20060119: MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ in that I did, on or between 20050711 and 20050811, wrongfully use a controlled substance commonly referred to as marijuana.20060119: Applicant to confinement. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801806

    Original file (MD0801806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Diagnosis with personality disorder not correct. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700031

    Original file (ND0700031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101615

    Original file (MD1101615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a careful review of the Applicant’s combat deployment history, combat injuries, in-service mental health issues, and diagnosed PTSD, coupled with the marital problems of the Applicant while deployed, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s PTSD and personal problems were mitigating and contributory factors in his misconduct.Given the facts of the record, the information provided by the Applicant, and the Applicant’s combat service, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s conduct, which...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002017

    Original file (ND1002017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Representation: NONE By a...