Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902138
Original file (ND0902138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ENFR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090714
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19871219 - 19880207     Active:   19880208 – 19920131 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19920201     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19961218      Highest Rank/Rate: EN2
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.6 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.7 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.80

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NAM (2) CGBP(SOS)R KLM


NJP :

- 19940518 :       Article 111 (Drunken or reckless driving on or about 19940430)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

- 19941004 :       Article 132 (Fraud against the United States)
         Article 134 (Making and uttering worthless checks), 8 specifications
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :

SPCM:

- 19950918 :       Art icle (UA), 2 Specifications
         Spec 1: 19950524-19950525, 1 day)
         Spec 2: 19950605-19950819, 75 day)
         Article 112a (Wrongfully use cocaine and marijuana on or about 19950819)
         Sentence : CONF 60 days (19951005-19951123, 49 days) BCD
C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19931118 : For writing bad checks and failure to pay just debts.

- 19940721 :       For violation of the UCMJ Article 111 (Drunken or reckless driving onboard Naval Station, San Diego, California, on or about 19940430)

- 19941005 :       For violation of the UCMJ, Article 132 (Fraud against the United States on or about 19940425; violation of the UCMJ, Article 134, 8 specification (Check, worthless, making and uttering by dishonorably failing to maintain funds)

- 19950417 :       For failure to provide continuous an adequate support to my lawful dependents as required by MILPERSMAN and Naval Regulations.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ COURT MARTIAL ”
         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 880208 UNTIL 920131 ”
“ 95MAY24-95MAY25; 95JUN05-95AUG1 9; 95OCT05-95NOV23; 95NOV23-96DEC18 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 96 until
14 December 1998, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE
OF COURT-MARTIAL

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0715             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant's clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 111 (Drunken or reckless driving), Article 132 (Fraud against the United States), and Article 134 (Making and uttering worthless checks, 2 specifications), and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence, 2 specifications) and Article 112a (Wrongful use of cocaine and marijuana) . The Applicant was found guilty of these charges and convicted at SPCM and sentenced to confinement for 60 days, forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for two months, reduction in paygrade to E-1, and discharged with a Bad Conduct discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that since leaving the military, he has been an ideal American taxpaying citizen and has worked and provided for his wife and two children. While it is commendable that the Applicant is a contributing member of society, he provides no supporting documentation. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Documentation to help support a post - service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to , a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate s (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug - free lifestyle. The Applicant did not provide any documentary evidence on h is behalf for post-service consideration. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the above paragraph with the full understanding that completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900212

    Original file (MD0900212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency will be granted, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct justifies clemency. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Bad Conduct Discharge”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided, clemency...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101190

    Original file (MD1101190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601140

    Original file (ND0601140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19920522Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19920524Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000556

    Original file (MD1000556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003887

    Original file (20120003887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    a. Paragraph 1-5a stated a commissioned or warrant officer would normally be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate unless conditions existed as indicated in paragraphs 1-5b and 1-5c, or as directed by the Secretary of the Army. b. Paragraph 1-5b stated a general discharge under honorable conditions was applicable in cases of unqualified resignation in circumstances involving serious misconduct; discharge because of serious misconduct, including misconduct for which punishment has...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900208

    Original file (MD0900208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Should the Applicant feel his post service conduct becomes substantial enough to warrant a personal appearance, there are veteran’s organizations, such as the American Legion, willing to provide guidance to assist former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400616

    Original file (MD1400616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the Applicant’s 3 years and 7 months of service, he was found guilty of violating multiple serious UCMJ articles at four NJPs, received five retention warnings, and met the requirements to be administratively separated for a Pattern of Misconduct, Commission of a Serious Offense, and Drug Abuse. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001462

    Original file (ND1001462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization of a discharge solely on the issue of making a former service member eligible to receive benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800310

    Original file (ND0800310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sentence-.Retention Warnings:.20061212: For Indebtedness due to bad check writing.20051028 :Frauds and waivers conducted an interview with Applicant on 20050921 re disclosure of a Chart A offense for a parking ticket Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00822

    Original file (MD01-00822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890829: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0701, 18Aug89 to 0645, 21Aug89 (2 days). The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. The applicant did not provide any documentation to warrant an...