Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901888
Original file (ND0901888.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AEAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090623
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1910-124 [PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20020814 - 20021215     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20021216     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20050419      Highest Rank/Rate: AEAN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 04 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 86
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.80

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20030326 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation by wearing civilian clothes during phase one NMT and exceeding curfew )
         Article (False official statements by saying she was in the entire night , which was false )
         Awarded: ORAL ADMONITION Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20040123 :      For failure to meet body fat composition standards.

- 20041129 :      For failure to comply with Family Care Plan.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         
Oth er Documentation :   


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Wants to use the G.I. B ill.
2. Her commanding officer recommended an Honorable discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0625             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included two NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and one nonjudicial punishment for violations o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications: wearing civilian clothes during phase one NMT and exceeding curfew) and Article 107 (False official statement: saying she was in the entire night, which was false). The Applicant was married to another Sailor and could not find adequate childcare. On 31 March 2004, the Applicant requested separation from the Navy and her command administratively processed her for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to cons ult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement .

Issue 1 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to use her G.I. Bill. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends her commanding officer recommended an Honorable characterization. Per his letter dated 14 January 2005, the commanding officer stated the Applicant was “an average to below average sailor during her naval career” and showed “limited potential for advancement.” However, he did recommend that she be honorably discharged fr o m the Naval S ervice. Pursuant to the Naval Military Personnel Manual, Article 1910-124, the characterization of separation is Honorable, unless an Entry Level Separation (ELS) or General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted per MILPERSMAN 1910-300. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action , but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of the discharge to Honorable , but the narrative reason for discharge shall remain as issued.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 19 May 2005, Article 1910-124, Separation by R eason of Convenience of the Government - Parenthood.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700764

    Original file (ND0700764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-EM3, USN ND07-00764 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20070515 Characterization Received: Narrative Reason: PARENTHODD OR CUSTODIAN OF MINOR CHILDREN Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-124 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: FAMILY HARDSHIP Applicant’s Issues: 1. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.” Additional Reviews: Subsequent to a document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001335

    Original file (ND1001335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issue: The Applicant contends that her characterization of service at discharge was inequitable as it was based on one isolated incident in over 35 months of otherwise honorable service, she was discharged due to parenthood - not for misconduct, and her performance and conduct of record warrant a characterization of Honorable. The Applicant’s service record documents...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501105

    Original file (ND0501105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“I think my general/under honorable conditions discharge was unfairly given in place of an honorable discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902281

    Original file (ND0902281.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800337

    Original file (ND0800337.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20000921 - 20001022 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20001023Period of enlistment:4 YearsDate of Discharge:20030930Length of Service: Yrs Mths08 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:24AFQT: 35Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.0 (2) Behavior: 3.0 (2)OTA: 3.17 (2)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol ,,,,, and Periods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101163

    Original file (ND1101163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000177

    Original file (ND1000177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 2001, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for administrative separation and the Applicant was discharged under Honorable conditions with a re-enlistment code of RE-3B (Parenthood or custody of minor children a member is unable to perform prescribed duties, or unable to comply with family care plan requirements-Ineligible to reenlist without a Commander, Navy Recruiting Command waiver). Pursuant to the Commanding Officer’s recommendation for administrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501287

    Original file (ND0501287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “Hardship”. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “hardship”.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700670

    Original file (ND0700670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700674

    Original file (ND0700674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of...