Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901462
Original file (ND0901462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MMFR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090505
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600 [COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19891120 - 19900723     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19900724     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19940914      Highest Rank/Rate: MM3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 81
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.5 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.55

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA :                  NJP:   SCM:   CC:

SPCM:

- 19940307 :      Article (Larceny and wrongful appropriation), 3 specifications
         Sentence: RIR to E-1 , 5 MONTHS (19940307 – 19940602, 87 days)
         CA’s Action: Confinement in excess of 105 days is suspended for 1 year unless sooner vacated .

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19930630: [Extracted from the Commanding Officer’s letter dated 22 July 04]

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
        
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  

         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         

         Oth er Documentation :



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Discharge was inequitable because it was base on one isolated incident in nearly 48 months of service.
2. Unfair rating of his evaluation was used during his cart-martial.
3 .       P ost-service conduct .

Decision

Date: 20 10 0506             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAV PERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 121 ( Larceny and wrongful appropriation , 3 specifications : steal U.S. currency in the value of $425.00, $62.50, and $172.50) . The Applicant’s summary of testimony: “I toke a shipmate I.D. card a bank card and had money sent to me...” Based on the offense s committed by the Applicant and his pretrial agreement , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to submit a written statement, but elected to consult with a qualified counsel and request an administrative board. By a vote of 3-0, an administrative discharge board found that the Applicant did commit misconduct , recommended separation with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization, and did not recommend that the separation be suspended. The commanding officer recommended an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service, but the Bureau of Personnel determined the characterization of service would be General (Under Honorable Conditions).

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was base d on one isolated incident in nearly 48 months of service . The NDRB advises the Applicant certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the service to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 121 which is considered a serious offense which could have resulted in a punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a special or general court-martial fit that criteria. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge , but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. The NDRB determined the awarded characterization was warranted.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends h is discharge was inequitable because h is evaluation was unfairly used during his court-martial. Based on the administrative separation notification lette r, the Applicant was notified he would be processed for separation for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (violation of Article 121 ). For the edification of the Applicant, a service member may be separated, regardless of his rank or record of service, based on commission of a serious offense when the offense warrants separation and the offense would warrant a punitive discharge. Based upon available records, nothing indicates the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. The NDRB determined the awarded character of service was warranted and the narrative reason for discharge

Issue 3 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service warrants consideration because he has held leadership positions at his job s, gone to college, married with children, done volunteer work with troubled children, and has stayed out of trouble since his discharge. T he NDRB conside rs post-service conduct in order to determine if the misconduct committed during active duty was indicative of the Applicant's character or an aberration. Besides the Applicant’s statement on his DD Form 293, he failed to provide documentation to support his contention and did not provide any additional documentation and evidence on his behalf to support a post-service conduct review. The Applicant’s statements alone, without sufficient documentary evidence, are not enough to form a basis of relief. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). Additionally, upon receipt of the Applicant's DD Form 293, the NDRB mails an acceptance letter that includes Information Concerning Review Procedures , which discusses the submission of additional documents in paragraph 3, Submission of Evidence , and in the last section on page 4, Information Pertaining to a Review Based Upon Post-Service Conduct . The Applicant should provide documentation which could include but not limited to: letters of personal references and verifiable employment record /letter of recommendation from his employers; evidence of an alcohol/drug free life style (completion of rehab/proof he attended Narcotics Anonymous or AA meetings); certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, evidence of financial stability (home ownership/home rental history, credit card payments); college transcripts; documentation of community/church service; a nd if married, a marriage certificate. The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 2 October 1996, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121 .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800004

    Original file (ND0800004.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900410 - 19900708 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19900709Period of enlistment:4 YearsDate of Discharge:19940518Length of Service: Yrs Mths10 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:19AFQT: 31Highest Rank/Rate:AO3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.4(4) Behavior:3.3(4)OTA: 3.35 (4)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):,, (w/2 bronze stars),, (w/ 2...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101287

    Original file (ND1101287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Clemency granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found that clemency was warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801501

    Original file (ND0801501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19940307 - 19940911Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940912Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19991022Length of Service: Years Months11 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 71Highest Rank/Rate:OS3EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIR Behavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):GCM NDSMNJP:-...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101206

    Original file (ND1101206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure the pertinent standards of equity and propriety were met.The Applicant’s record of service included for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ):Article(,, 0730 - 0815, 10 October 2008), Article (,, wrongfully using government credit card to obtain cash and merchandise), and Article (Wrongful appropriation, , steal money from property of Bank of America in the amount...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200804

    Original file (ND1200804.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200060

    Original file (ND1200060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100905

    Original file (ND1100905.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for the G.I. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101608

    Original file (ND1101608.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities. The Applicant was processed for administrative separation due to Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) as the result of an NJP where she was found guilty of violating UCMJ Article 121 (Larceny and wrongful appropriation) and Article 107 (False official statements). ” Additional Reviews : After a document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100862

    Original file (ND1100862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    : (Decisional) (Board Issue) (Equity) During the NDRB’s review of the Applicant’s request for an upgrade, the NDRB identified an impropriety in her dischargein that she did not meet the requirement for separation according to MILPERSMAN Article 1910-138, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions, dated 22 Aug 2002 to 25 April 2005.Pursuant to MILPERSMAN Article 1910-138, “Members may be processed for separation based upon a series of at least three, but not more...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101068

    Original file (ND1101068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...