Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901225
Original file (ND0901225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PNSN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090407
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to: CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY (KFV)

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19990824 - 19991026     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19991027     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20020127      Highest Rank/Rate: PN3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.33

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

NJP :
- 20000930 :       Art icle 91 ( Disobeying a Chief Petty Officer ) , 3 specifications
         Article 86 (UA)
          Awarded : Susp ended :

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- Undated :        For CO’s NJP on 20000930 for violation of UCMJ Article 91 (Disobeying a Chief Petty Officer).

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         

Oth er Documentation :   





Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 14 August 2001 until
21 August 2002, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        Would like to reenlist /become a n officer when he finishes school.
2.       C laiming personality disorder was the quickest way to be discharged in order to take care of his spouse .

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 1119             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall remain PERSONALITY DISORDER.

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning for disobeying a chief petty officer) , and one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized absence ) and Article 91 ( Disobeying a chief petty officer - 3 specifications). Additionally, the Applicant ’s Chronological Record of Medical Care, SF 600 of 9 November 2000, reflects the following:
1) he was seen by the independent duty corpsman on board the USS STOUT ( DDG 55) after threatening to kill himself by taking a bottle of tylo x , 2) he had a past history of suicidal ideations, and 3) desired to solve problems in his marriage by committing suicide. Based on this information , the Applicant was referred to Navy Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) that same day and admitted for further evaluation and treatment as outlined in the NMCP –Transdisciplinary Discharge Form 6300/22 signed by the Applicant and his discharge/attending physician on 13 Novemb er 2000 . The A pplicant was hospitalized from 9 -13 November 2000 , with the following diagnosis: cocaine and amphetamine dependence in remission and personality disorder with borderline and antisocial features . Additionally, the medical record s indicate the following: 1) the Applicant was admitted for suicidal ideations in context of marital separation and difficulty adjusting to the US Navy, 2) he ha d a history of suicidal attempts in the past and was quickly stabilized on ward, 3) was deemed not imminently su i cidal or homicidal but was determined to be a continuing risk to harm himself or others, and 4) was recommend ed for expeditious administrative separation, to join the administrative separation psychiatric support group, to attend Alcoholic Anonymous meetings, and to follow-up with the command drug alcohol program advisor . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived right s to consult with qualified counsel, submit a w ritten statement, or request a review by the general court-martial convening authority.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant noted on his DD Form 293 that when he finishes his four year degree, he would like to reenter the Navy as an officer. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant is seeking a change in his separation code and narrative reason from “Personality Disorder” to “ Condition, No t a D isability . ” The Applicant contends the following: 1) his wife had back surgery, 2) he needed to care for her since none of their family members were available, 3) his commanding officer wanted him separated from the ship so that he could be replaced, and 4) claiming a personality disorder was the quickest way he could achieve this. T he Applicant submitted transcripts from Barstow College and Colorado Technical University and indicated he had been working for Chevron Corporation since 2006 . T he Applicant also assert ed that if he had a personality disorder he would not be able to accomplish all of these things. Additionally, he submitted two separate Board for Correction of Military Records Decisions for c onsideration by the NDRB . However, the Applicant failed to describe the specific principles and facts contained in these decisions and the relevance of these decisions to his case . The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the NDRB in this case in the absence of a complete medical record and discharge package . After reviewing the evidence of record and documentary evidence presented by the Applicant , the NDRB determined the Applicant was properly separated due to a personality disorder . T herefore , a change in his narrative reason and separation code is neither warranted nor appropriate. As noted in the medical evidence discussed supra , two years prior to being discharged t he Applicant was hospitalized for four days due to suicidal ideations , had a past history of suicidal ideations and attempts and was experiencing difficulty adjusting to the Navy . The Applicant was diagnosed with a “p ersonality d isorder ” by competent medical authority and recommended for expeditious administrative separation from the Navy two years before the date of his actual discharge . The Applicant's DD Form 214, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, indicates he was separated for a Personality Disorder. The Applicant has failed to provide any written documentation or justification for changing his narrative reason to condition not a disability . Therefore, based on a review of available records and applying the presumption of regularity in the absence of up-to-d ate medical records , the NDRB determined "Personality Disorder" is an accurate narrative description of the reason for the Applicant's discharge .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, evidence presented by the Applicant and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraph titled Additional Reviews .




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600968

    Original file (ND0600968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040123: NMCP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation: Applicant reported since being on the ship he has been depressed. Issue 1: (Equity).The Applicant claims his discharge was for mental health issues and not related to any misconduct.When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Additionally, the NDRB does not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100236

    Original file (ND1100236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020731 - 20021103Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20021104Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: Years14 MONTHSExtensionDate of Discharge:20071214Highest Rank/Rate:EN2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 11 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 53EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.7(3)Behavior:2.0(3)OTA: 3.09Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902118

    Original file (ND0902118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001887

    Original file (ND1001887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Moreover, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201703

    Original file (MD1201703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900962

    Original file (ND0900962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Applicant’s record of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000179

    Original file (ND1000179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was dual notified for separation due to Convenience of the Government – Personality Disorder in accordance with paragraph 1910-122 of the Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) and Misconduct – Commission of a Serious Offense (1910-142).The Applicant was further advised that the primary reason for discharge was Personality Disorder and that he was being recommended to receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service at discharge. On 02 September...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501403

    Original file (ND0501403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On this basis, we proffer that amendment of the narrative reason to Secretarial Authority is also warranted.In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.116 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. Due to Applicant’s personality disorder, the patient may not be suitable for further military service. The Applicant was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600226

    Original file (MD0600226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. The patient denied symptoms of psychosis, including auditory and visual hallucinations, paranoia, ideas of reference, or an active delusional system. The Applicant provided one...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101946

    Original file (ND1101946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful consideration of the available records, documentary evidence submitted by the Applicant, and extensive testimony during the personal hearing, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s administrative separation from the Navy on the basis of Personality Disorder was proper. Partial relief warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, the administrative separation discharge process,...