Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900984

Original file (ND0900984.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090310

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19961119 - 19970908     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19970909     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20000421      Highest Rank/Rate: SA
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 09 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 35
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 1.3 ( 3 )      Behavior: 1.3 ( 3 )        OTA: 1.44

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA : 19990608-19990609 (1 DAY); 19990911-19990914 (3 DAYS)

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:

C C :
- 20000307 :       Offense: Destruction of P roperty
         Sentence : 12 months in jail (suspended), $500.00 restitution plus $518.00 court cost.

Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 28, effective 30 March 2000 to
21 August 2000, Article 1910-144, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Civilian Conviction.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Seeking upgrade to obtain benefits to further her education.
2.       Claims she was a ssaulted by five military personnel while on active duty .

Decision

Date: 20090827            Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one civilian conviction at the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk for u nlawfully damag ing property valued at over $1000.00 . Additionally, the Applicant was in an unauthorized absence status for a total of 4 days. Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When processed for a dministrative s eparation, the Applicant waived rights to consult with qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and obtain copies of documentation forwarded to the separation authority.

: (Nondecisional) In seeking an upgrade to Honorable, the Applicant contends she is trying to further her education at Kaplan University and needs help with her school funding. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that while on active duty she was attacked by five military personnel while on active duty because they thought her son had given another child measles . She added that since being discharged , she has been trying to accomplish something in her life. The Applicant d id not indicate how the alleged attack relates to her civilian conviction or separation from the Navy, nor did she provide any evidence documenting the event . The NDRB determined that based on the evidence of record, overall evaluation marks, length of service, seriousness of the offense committed and lack of mitigating evidence , an upgrade is not warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .]

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400662

Original file (ND1400662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20091209 - 20100920Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100921Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130315Highest Rank/Rate:QMSNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 25 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.3(3)Behavior:1.3(3)OTA: 1.56Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201117

Original file (ND1201117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020821 - 20030817Active: 20030818 -20070807 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070808Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100723Highest Rank/Rate:HT2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 15 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 71EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(3)Behavior:1.3(3)OTA: 3.04Awards and Decorations...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201010

Original file (MD1201010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the Applicant’s service records and her statement, the NDRB noted that she was diagnosed while in service with non-combat-related PTSD, chronic mental illness, and major depression. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201306

Original file (ND1201306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the records, the NDRB determined her personal problems did not mitigate her misconduct and determined she was responsible for her actions and warranted discharge after the DUI arrest. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101792

Original file (ND1101792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20050122 - 20050425Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050426Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090408Highest Rank/Rate:ANLength of Service:Years Months13 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 64EvaluationMarks:Performance:1.8(4)Behavior:1.3(4)OTA: 1.67Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM GWOTSMPeriods...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301335

Original file (ND1301335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

With three NJPs and two retention warnings in 13 months of service, his discharge Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for a Pattern of Misconduct was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200982

Original file (ND1200982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Separation Authority determined the Applicant’s “psychiatric condition affected her potential for performance of expected duties and responsibilities while on active duty and poses a risk if she is retained in the naval service.” Based on the Applicant’s length of service and her diagnosis of adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, the NDRB determined the assigned characterization of service and narrative reason for separation of service were proper and...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500541

Original file (ND1500541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PERSONALITY DISORDER. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500811

Original file (ND1500811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300589

Original file (ND1300589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation treatment failure, command administratively processed for separation. After a complete review of her service, deployments, misconduct, and alcohol incidents, the NDRB determined she was provided with appropriate alcohol counseling, and her General characterization of service was equitable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900984

Similar Decisions