Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900897
Original file (ND0900897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HTFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090304
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20001030 - 20001120     Active:   20001121 - 20031130 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20031201     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20041223      Highest Rank/Rate: HT2
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 22 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 58
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 4.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.86

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

- 20040729 :       Art icle 112a ( Wrongful use of a controlled substance )
         Awarded : Susp ended :

- 20040812 :       Article 112a ( Wrongful use of a controlled substance )
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :   

SPCM:   

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 20001121 TO 20031130 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.




Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident.
Decision

Date: 20090702            Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Per the Applicant’s Record of Military Processing, DD Form 1966, signed
27 October 2000, he used marijuana 15 times prior to enlisting in the Navy. The Applicant’s service record reflects during his current enlistment he was awarded two non - judicial punishments (NJPs) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 112a, ( w rongful use of a controlled substance - 2 specifications). The presumption of regularity was applied in the absence of an available administrative separations discharge package. Per the DD Form 214, the Applicant was discharged for misconduct due to drug abuse and given a separation code of GKK, indicating he had an administrative separation board.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Appl icant is seeking an upgrade to an H onorable discharge, contending that his discharge was inequitable becau s e it was based on one isolated incident in 40 months of service with no other adverse action. The Applican t has also submitted a letter from Christian Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri of 3 October 2007, indicating he has completed a 24 - day treatment program and tested negative on his last tw o drug screens . Despite a service member’s record of service , wrongful use of drugs is a serious offense which require s mand atory processing for separation. Separation under these conditions usually results in characterization of service as U nder O ther T ha n Honorable . The Board determined that there was cred ible corroboration in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs prior to entering the military and continued to use drugs on more than one occasion while on active duty —as evidenced by his two NJPs for drug use. Therefore, the contention that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident is without merit and contradicted by the aforementioned evidence of record.

The NDRB commends the Applicant for completing treatment and remaining drug- free, but determined that his post- service conduct (drug treatment) was not sufficient to mitigate the mis conduct which precipitated the discharge. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing until fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700495

    Original file (ND0700495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990430 - 19990511Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990512Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20010118 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 08Mths07 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900676

    Original file (MD0900676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion :().The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade because his only misconduct was an isolated use of steroids which was known to the command only because of the Applicant’s admission. The NDRB determined a discharge upgrade based on these Issues,which were already considered by his Administrative Separation Board and his chain of command up to and including the Division Commander, would be inappropriate.After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500253

    Original file (MD1500253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included one 6105 counseling warning, one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 128 (Assault); and one summary court-martial (SCM) for violation of the UCMJ: Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801687

    Original file (MD0801687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant has requested an upgrade to his discharge characterization to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”. Due to the Applicant’s repeated and deliberate misconduct, the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate, an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901940

    Original file (ND0901940.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200773

    Original file (ND1200773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure for Misconduct (Drug Abuse), Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct), and Misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense), the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.Issue 1: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901601

    Original file (MD0901601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300843

    Original file (ND1300843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the available records, to include significant, credible evidence submitted by the Applicant. The NDRB determined full relief to Honorable was not warranted based on the frequency of the Applicant’s misconduct.Summary: After a careful review of the Applicant’s post-service documentation and official service records, and the facts and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700053

    Original file (ND0700053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in his administrative discharge and in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20010818Reason for Discharge - - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLEDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20010818Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001537

    Original file (ND1001537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.