ex-FR, USN

                  Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090219
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER)
Authority for Discharge:  MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:  Characterization change to:
                   Narrative Reason change to:

                             Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:   USNR (DEP) 20000609 - 20000619   Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:  20000620     Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment:   Years   Extension
Date of Discharge:  20000821 Highest Rank/Rate:  FR
Length of Service:   Year(s)     Month(s)   2 Day(s)
Education Level:       AFQT:  36
Evaluation Marks:      Performance:  0.0     Behavior:  0.0   OTA:  0.00

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

    - 20000707:  For failure to follow rules and regulations of RTC,
             specifically failure to follow lawful order.


    - 20000710:  For violation of page 13; failure to follow RTC rules and
             regulations.


    - 20000727:  For violating RTC rules and regulations concerning recruit
             to recruit contact and profanity.

            Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214:

        “MILPERSMAN 1910-154”
        “JGA”
        “ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the
DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.




                    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
                                         DD 214:    Service/Medical Record:
              Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
      Employment:                 Finances:
Education/Training:
      Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:
Criminal Records:
      Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:
References:
              Additional Statements:
                             From Applicant:       From Representation:
      From Congress member:
                    Other Documentation:      - Reference letters from wife
and father-in-law.

                          Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29,
effective 11 July 2000 until 24 January 2001, Article 1910-154, Separation
by Reason of Entry Level Performance and Conduct.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211,
Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503,
Equity.

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                     NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
                    DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

                             Applicant’s Issues
1. Seeks reenlistment opportunity into the U.S. Army.
2. Youth and immaturity were cause of discharge.

                                  Decision

Date:  20090507        Location:  Washington D.C.  Representation:

By a vote of  the Characterization shall   (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION).
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND
CONDUCT.

                                 Discussion

: (Nondecisional)   either  which the Board cannot form the basis of relief
for the Applicant, or  the Board does not have the authority to grant the
relief for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to
the Addendum, specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding .

:  (Decisional) ()  .  The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy
can be attributed to mistakes because “I was young and stupid and admit I
was out of line, not allowing myself to adapt.”  While he may feel his
youth was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence
does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his misconduct
or should not be held accountable for his actions due to youth or
immaturity. The Applicant requests an upgrade of his characterization to
Honorable because he has matured and is ready to be a “worthy and
productive member of the United States Military.”  In reviewing discharges,
the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless
there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include
evidence submitted by the Applicant.  The Applicant’s record of service was
marred by three NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings for rules violations
during recruit training. The Applicant’s violations included violating
recruit-on-recruit contact, profanity, and failure to follow lawful orders.
 From day one of recruit training, the Applicant was unreliable,
belligerent, and often disrespectful.  The Applicant’s failure to adapt to
a military lifestyle directly resulted in his administrative discharge.
For entry level separations, an Honorable discharge is an exception to the
characterization of service when it is clearly warranted by presence of
unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance, and is
approved on a case-by-case basis by the Secretary of the Navy.  The
Applicant’s record of service clearly demonstrates he did not meet the
requirements for an Honorable discharge, and because he was on continuous
active duty for less than 180 days, his request is without merit.  Relief
denied.

The Board noted administrative errors on the Applicant’s DD Form 214,
blocks 25 (Separation Authority), 26 (Separation Code) and 28 (Narrative
Reason for Separation).  Per the Commanding Officer, Recruit Training
Command, ltr 1910 Ser 10/L4322 of 21 Aug 2000, the reason for processing
was “Entry Level Performance and Conduct as evidenced by failure to adapt
to the naval environment.”  The Applicant did not meet the requirements for
an Erroneous Entry (Other) separation but did meet the requirements for
separation by reason of entry level performance and conduct, to wit: (1)
was in an entry level status (i.e., within first 180 days of continuous
active duty on the date of notification of administrative separation
processing); (2) was determined unqualified for further naval service by
reason of unsatisfactory performance and conduct as evidenced by failure to
adapt to the naval environment; and (3) violated a NAVPERS 1070/613,
administrative remarks, counseling/warning which specifically addresses the
individual's unsatisfactory performance and/or conduct (MILPERSMAN 1910-
204).  The NDRB will recommend changes to Navy Personnel Command.

Summary:  After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the
Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process
and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found    Therefore, the
awarded characterization of service shall remain Uncharacterized (Entry
Level Separation) and, based on an administrative error, the narrative
reason for separation shall change to Entry Level Performance and Conduct.

                  ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is
unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise
comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction
1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of
that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP,
The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of
the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint
procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is
designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable
requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction
1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at
“http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are
eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is
received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The
Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service
accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.
Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not
required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years,
has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise
exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC
20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for
post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no
requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of
obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a
foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The NDRB has no authority to upgrade
a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational
opportunities.  Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of
the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over
reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any
other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a
reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the NDRB has no
authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing
reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a
bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the
processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not
preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that
separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for
other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical
Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative
involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct,
the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case
remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.
If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for
misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is
authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated
health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to
change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical
disability or other medical related reasons.  Only the Board for Correction
of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an
unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time
or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The
NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the
recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a
basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and
conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of
documentation that may be provided to the NDRB include proof of educational
pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community
service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification
of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and
material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the
NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence
of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.
With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action
of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an
act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  The
NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or
dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are
recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the
service records by writing to:

                         Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                         Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
                         720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                         Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023