Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900555
Original file (ND0900555.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090109
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1910-138 MISCONDUCT MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19991209 - 20000112     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20000113     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20010420      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: NFIR
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 2.0 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.58

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Period of UA : 20000526-20000530

NJP :
- 20000602 :       Art icle 86 (UA), 2 specifications
         Article 87 (Missing movement)
         Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order)
          Awarded : Susp ended :

- 20010315 :       Article 86 (UA from duty)
         Article 134 (Incapacitated for performance of duty)
                  Awarded : Susp ended : Vacated 20010330

- 20010419 :       Article 134 (Breaking restriction)
                   Awarded : Susp ended: RESTR

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ 1910-138 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.


Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 26, effective 4 January 2000 until
24 February 2002, Article 1910-138 , Separation By Reason Of Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Applicant claims he was suffering from PTSD.

Decision

Date: 20090827            Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS.
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included non-judicial punishments ( ) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (Unauthorized absences – 3 specifications), Article 87 (Missing ship’s movement), Article 92 (Failure to obey other lawful order), and Article 134 (Incapacitation for performance of duty and b reaking restriction ) . The Applicant also had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana thirty-five times prior to entering the Navy. The NDRB did not have access to the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a review by the general court-martial convening authority. The Applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates he was administratively separated for misconduct and assigned a separation code of “JKN” indicating he was not entitled to an administrative board. The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied in the absence of an administrative separation package.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant is seeking an upgrade to Honorable and contends he was suffering from PTSD and did not know the effects it would have on him. Pursuant to a staff psychiatrist’s (Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia) medical record of 29 January 2001, the Applicant was onboard the USS COLE (DDG-67) at the time of the fatal bombing on 12 October 2000 and was screened for possible after effects. The impressions of a clinical psychologist in an undated letter reflects the following: 1) the Applicant started drinking at age 19 (prior to enlisting), 2) was a survivor of the USS COLE, 3) is now suffering from symptoms of PTSD (mild) and bereavement, 4) was returned to full duty, 5) will continue counseling, and 6) will obtain an alcohol evaluation for an alcohol related incident.

The NDRB app reciates the Applicant ’s service and s acrifices that he has made for our country and extends its condolence to him in the loss of friends and injuries he may have sustained during the attack on the USS COLE. However, in reviewing the record of evidence, including medical records which support the Applicant’s diagnosis of PTSD, the NDRB was not convinced that the Applicant’s misconduct was a result of PTSD as evidenced by the fact that he had been awarded his first three NJP s for violations of Articles 86, 87 and 92, and received below average marks/comments on a performance evaluation 4 months prior to th e attack . Specifically, his supervisor noted in the report that the Applicant had “earned a poor reputation due to early mistakes.” Additionally, the medical evidence indicates the Applicant had a history of alcohol and drug use prior to entering the service and continued to abuse alcohol during his enlistment as evidenced by his second NJP which included a violation of Article 134- incapacitation for performance of duty. Based on the foregoing, the NDRB determined that an upgrade to Honorable was not appropriate.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and medical records, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MINOR DISCIPLINARY INFRACTIONS.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801190

    Original file (ND0801190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant did not submit any post service medical records to support his allegations of kidney failure. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800638

    Original file (ND0800638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reenlistment Opportunities Decision Date: 20080501Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901659

    Original file (ND0901659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. However, the NDRB does not agree with the Applicant’s assertion that her separation code is incorrect since she was administratively separated for misconduct (minor disciplinary infractions).Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01248

    Original file (ND04-01248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00552

    Original file (ND03-00552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.981023: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-138. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600839

    Original file (ND0600839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decisional Issues: Equity – Isolated incident Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)Letter from Department of Veterans Affairs, dated January 27, 2004Four pages of Applicant’s medical record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601054

    Original file (ND0601054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.19910628: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 134: Drunkenness - incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor.Award: Forfeiture of $400 for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19900430: Applicant admitted to Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501081

    Original file (ND0501081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01081 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050614. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Captain s_ told me when he decided I should be separated that if I didn’t sign he’ll make my life miserable.

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100084

    Original file (MD1100084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600985

    Original file (ND0600985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violation of UCMJ Article 134 (2 specifications): Disorder conduct), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, and advised being processed.20020612: Applicant’s statement. Priopriety – Requested court martial and was discharged insteadNavy regulations provide that separation processing may be initiated when a service member has violated a retention warning and there is a documented series of at least three minor disciplinary infractions during the current enlistment. If a...