Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900451
Original file (ND0900451.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20081216
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19941022 - 19950125     Active:   19950126 - 19950224

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20020531     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20040108      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Inactive Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 09 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 33
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 2.67

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:             C C :

Retention Warning Counseling : NFIR

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 26 April 2005, Article 1910-15 6 , SEPARATION BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Reenlistment opportunity.
2. Separated for failure to pay debts, which have now been resolved.

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 0320             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY .
Discussion

 The NDRB noted numerous errors in the administrative separation processing in the Applicant’s case. Specifically, the Applicant was notified she was being processed for separation due to “Misconduct – Pattern of M isconduct as evidenced by a set pattern to pay just debts” but the narrative reason on the DD-214 reflects she was separated due to “Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve due to misconduct – Pattern of Misconduct as evidenced by a set pattern of failure to pay just debts ” , which is not a valid narrative reason for separation. The NDRB determined the remedy for this administrative error is to change the narrative reason for the Applicant’s discharge to “Secretarial Authority.” The NDRB advises the Applicant this change is directed by the NDRB apart from the Issues presented by the Applicant in her DD-293 Application.

The NDRB further advises the Applicant her discharge, although administratively flawed, was based on substantiated misconduct. Therefore the NDRB presumes the characterization of service given, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was proper at the time the Applicant was discharged. The Issues presented by the Applicant to warrant a discharge upgrade are addressed below.

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding this Issue.
: ( ) . The Applicant contends she is entitled to a discharge upgrade because the unpaid debt which led to her discharge has been settled. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by evidence the Applicant misused her Government Travel Charge Card and was 120 days past due in pay ment s . The Applicant did not submit evidence to support her claim she has settled her account . Furthermore, the Applicant was not separated because she owed money on her Government Travel Card, but because she disobeyed orders and regulations pertaining to misuse of the travel card and failure to repay debts incurred with the t ravel c ard. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade to the Applicant’s characterization of service would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable except for the administrative errors noted above.




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500305

    Original file (ND1500305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any documentation of her travel, travel claim, credit card statements, or emails with the command to substantiate her case. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021668

    Original file (20140021668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence. The first counseling form shows her first sergeant (1SG) counseled her for failure to pay her government travel card debt. Her record contains a notification of separation proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve – Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 12-1b (A pattern of misconduct) dated 19 August 2011, wherein her commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500397

    Original file (ND1500397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record clearly shows that the written counseling and notification of separation proceedings were for her Pattern of Misconduct - Failure to Pay Just Debts and she was subsequently discharged for the same. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11291-10

    Original file (11291-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment status because of your failure to satisfactorily attend scheduled drills and misconduct as evidenced by your failure to pay just debts and misuse of a government credit card. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002022

    Original file (MD1002022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service record Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that clemency was not warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901749

    Original file (MD0901749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the Applicant did not provide sufficient post-service documentary evidenceto form a basis of relief.On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500191

    Original file (ND1500191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401069

    Original file (ND1401069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Although the Applicant stated that she went to NJP on her DD FORM 293 in 2010 for violation of Article 92, during her personal hearing, she submitted documentary evidence showing that she requested a trial by court-martial for the Article 92 violation that coincided with being the same day that she was notified for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600015

    Original file (ND0600015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The NDRB has no authority to provided additional review of this case since Applicant’s discharge occurred more than 15 years ago.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700696

    Original file (ND0700696.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post- service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a...