Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900322

Original file (ND0900322.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YN3, USNR

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20081125

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: (COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE)
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20020318 - 20020714     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20020715     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20051107      Highest Rank/Rate: YN3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 63
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 2.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 1.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 2.41

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NDSM Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C : Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ : Article 89 ( Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer ) .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Punishment too severe for the Article 92 offense charged.

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 0305 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE) .

Discussion

: ( ) . The Applicant is seeking an upgrade to honorable and contends he r punishment was too severe considering “ the Article 92 offense I was charged ”. Furthermore, she contends since this was a first time offense during her 3 years of service , the punishment should have been lim i ted to “ minor offense punishment ” . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s service record reflects she was processed for administrative separation based on the commission of a serious offense for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 89 ( Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer) and physical fitness assessment failure. Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the n aval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Open disrespect toward superior commissioned officers is on e such offense. In response to the Applicant‘s contention the punishment was too severe, there is no evidence in the record of disciplinary action taken against the App licant during this enlistment which supports this claim. T he Applicant also contends her punishment should have been limited to minor offense punishment. While the Applicant may be under the impression her offense was minor , v iolation of Article 89 is considered a serious offense and one for which a bad conduct discharge can be awarded if convicted at a court - martial as authorized under the Manual for Court-Martial .

For the edification of the Applicant, ad ministrative separations are not punitive in nature even though there may be negative consequences resulting from being involuntarily separated with anything less than a n honorable characterization of service. However, b ased upon available records, there is no indication the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. A preponderance of the evidence reviewed supports the conclusion the Applicant committed a serious offense and that separation from the n aval service was appropriate . The Board determined the awarded discharge characterization of “G eneral ( Und er Honor able C onditions) ” was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900585

Original file (ND0900585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade founded upon the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601037

Original file (ND0601037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed Robbery and used a firearm during the robbery in question. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902249

Original file (ND0902249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Board determined an upgrade would be...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001083

Original file (ND1001083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700828

Original file (ND0700828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel NOT FOUND IN RECORD Obtain Copies of Documents NOT FOUND IN RECORD Submit Statement(s) (date) NOT FOUND IN RECORD Administrative Board NOT FOUND IN RECORD GCMCA review NOT FOUND IN RECORD Administrative Board Date : Code on DD-214 indicates board waivedSeparation Authority (date): Commanding Officer, Helicopter Combat Support Squadron Six (20050302) Reason for discharge...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700887

Original file (ND0700887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Sentence - .Retention Warnings: .20041005: For underage drinking, in violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ.. Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902500

Original file (ND0902500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board foundTherefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700152

Original file (ND0700152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of UCMJ Article 89 (Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a non-commissioned officer, and Article 128 (Assault upon a petty officer) are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20060224 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s)...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700287

Original file (ND0700287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19891213 - 19900305Active: 19900306 - 19940310 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940311Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19961122Length of Service: 02 Yrs 08Mths12 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined:...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200850

Original file (ND1200850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900322

Similar Decisions