Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900128
Original file (ND0900128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20081023
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600 (pattern of misconduct)

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: or general
                   Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19920128 - 19920909     Active: 

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19920910      Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19950407       Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 28 D ay(s)
Education Level:         AFQT: 40
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 3.6 ( 2 )     Behavior: 3.6 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.70

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     W/BRONZE STAR LoC

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:
- 19940401 :      Article 86 (UA)
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacate suspension 19940603.
- 19940603 :      Article 86 (UA)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 19950130 :      Article 128 (Assault)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19940401 :      For absence without leave.
- 19940729 :      For alcohol abuse.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements:

 Related to Post-Service Period (cont):

From Applicant:         From Representation:     From Congress member:

Other Documentation:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 2 October 1996),
Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ: Article 128 (Assault).


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Needed more intense alcohol dependency treatment.
2. Post service conduct, no longer alcohol dependent.

Decision

Date: 20090212         Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

Issue 1: ( ) . The Applicant has requested an upgrade in his discharge characterization stating he needed more intense alcohol dependency treatment. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by three NJPs for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Articles 86 (UA), 2 specifications and Article 128 (Assault). These are considered serious offenses which could have resulted in a punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court martial. The command did not refer the Applicant for a court martial but opted instead for an administrative discharge.

The Navy provides three levels of alcohol abuse prevention and rehabilitation programs, with Level III (residential rehabilitation) being the highest level of treatment. Residential rehabilitation is designed for those members who have been formally evaluated and diagnosed as alcohol dependent and who require rehabilitation on a full-time, live-in basis. The Sailors must, in the opinion of their commanding officers, show potential for continued naval service. The Applicant was offered and completed the Navy’s Level III Residential Rehabilitation Program in July 1994. Beyond this program the member must take responsibility for their actions and rely on the training and their aftercare program to stay on an alcohol free path. Unfortunately, the Applicant failed the aftercare program established for him by the Alcohol Rehabilitation Center, Beaufort, SC. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s claim he needed a higher level alcohol treatment is without merit as he completed the highest level treatment offered in the military. The awarded discharge characterization for his pattern of misconduct was appropriate; an upgrade would be inappropriate.

Issue 2: ( ) . The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to help support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attending or completion of higher education (official transcripts) and documentation of alcohol non-dependency and a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he failed to provide any additional documentation and evidence on his behalf, particularly any documentation of post-service alcohol rehabilitation or treatment. To warrant an upgrade the


Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced additional evidence as stated in the above paragraph with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.
Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600731

    Original file (ND0600731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). No indication of appeal in the record.021210: Reduction to E-3 and forfeiture of $734.00 awarded and suspended on 021119 vacated due to continued misconduct.021217: Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Department Diagnoses: AXIS I: Alcohol dependence. Applicant should: 1.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600906

    Original file (ND0600906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs, a violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901937

    Original file (ND0901937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600892

    Original file (ND0600892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Equity – Quality of service: The Applicant contends that this discharge should be upgraded because he has Honorable discharges for his service from 6/89 to 6/93.While the Board acknowledges the Applicant’s previous honorable discharges, the period of service under review is the period of service wherein the Applicant committed misconduct and was discharged. The names,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200545

    Original file (MD1200545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further directed that, upon discharge, the Applicant receive an RE-4 re-entry code (not recommended for reenlistment). Therefore, the NDRB determined that the narrative reason for separation is accurate and relief is not warranted based on issues of propriety.The NDRB requested and received the Applicant’s service medical record and VA medical treatment records. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801123

    Original file (ND0801123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600989

    Original file (ND0600989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20050825Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCT - alcohol abuse rehabilitation failureLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050825Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLEObtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLESeparation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700215

    Original file (ND0700215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by a Special Courts-Martial for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92, (Violate a lawful general regulation by wrongfully consuming an alcoholic beverage while under the age of 21), Article 111 (Operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol), Article128 (Commit an assault upon a police sergeant by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000839

    Original file (MD1000839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the report noted that the Applicant admitted to having “four (4) alcohol related blackouts, ten (10) incidents of passing out, and ten (10) fights/altercations.” The Applicant was diagnosed as AXIS I: Alcohol Abuse (Suspect Dependence) and recommended for continued abstinence from alcohol and Level II Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment.In the 28 Oct 1998 Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base Quantico, endorsement of the Applicant’s administrative separation package, the CO states...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801783

    Original file (ND0801783.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20040610 - 20050112Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20050113Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070119Highest Rank/Rate:AMANLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)07 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 47EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.0(2)OTA: 2.75Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM GWOTSM...