Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900082
Original file (ND0900082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YNSN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20081015
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: TO ATTEND SCHOOL
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1910-108 [EARLY RELEASE TO FURTHER EDUCATION]

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19970428 - 19970924     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19970925     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20010810      Highest Rank/Rate: YN3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 16 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 34
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 4 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 4 )        OTA: 3.06

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      EAWS INSIGNIA GCM

Period s of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20010211 :       Art icle 92 ( Disobedience of a lawful order), 2 specifications
         Article 117 (Provoking speech/gestures)
         Article 91 (Disrespect toward a Senior Petty Officer)
          Awarded : Susp ended : [Extracted from Evaluation Report and Counseling Re cord, Block 41, Comments on Performance dated 20010211.]

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         

Oth er Documentation :   





Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, Change 33, effective 6 June 2001 until 21 August 2002, Article 1910-108, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - EARLY RELEASE TO FURTHER EDUCATION.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Discharge too harsh.
2.       Post-service conduct.
Decision

Date: 20091203   Location: Washington D.C.       R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall TO ATTEND SCHOOL.
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order - 2 specifications), Article 117 (Provoking speech/gestures), and Article 91(Disrespect toward a senior petty officer). Per the Applicant’s DD Form 214, he was separated prior to the expiration of his enlistment to attend a school of higher learning. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s request for administrative separation, therefore, a presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant represented by the American Legion is requesting an upgrade to Honorable and contends that his discharge was too harsh. Pursuant to Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) 1910 –108 Commanding officers (CO) with special court-martial convening authority or higher may approve request for separation to attend an institution of higher learning if the member is within 90 days of their expiration of active obligated service. The member’s performance of duty must meet Honorable conditions and have been such that the member is deserving of consideration for early separation and the characterization of discharge will be Honorable. The Board found that the characterization of discharge was inequitable since the Applicant was discharged based on a request to attend school. Pursuant to the MILPERSMAN th e Applicant’s CO should not have approved the request for early release to attend school unless the Applicant’s performance met Honorable conditions. Based on a review of the evidence of record and applicable regulation , the Board determined that an upgrade is warranted and voted unanimously to upgrade the Applicant’s discharge characterization to Honorable.
Issue 2: The Board did not address this issue since the relief that the Applicant is seeking has been granted.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain TO ATTEND SCHOOL.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400516

    Original file (ND1400516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge.However, based on post-service considerations, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001562

    Original file (ND1001562.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Relief denied.Summary: After...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400045

    Original file (ND1400045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his service record of four yearswarrants consideration for an upgrade to Honorable.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900084

    Original file (ND0900084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.Should the Applicant obtain additional evidence or post service documentation he may wish to apply for a personal appearance. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000395

    Original file (ND1000395.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” In the commanding officer’s 16 May 1996 recommendation for administrative separation to the Chief of Naval Personnel, he stated: “…Member’s lack of desire for further Naval service has been determined non-compliant for separation under this article (MPM 3630900 best interest of the service). After careful consideration of all the available evidence and documentation, the Board found this issue did not provide a basis for which relief could be granted.Summary: After a thorough review of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500432

    Original file (MD1500432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, and for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 128 (Assault), Article 86 (Absence without leave; 2 specifications), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct towards a warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer), and Article 108 (Military property of the United States – Loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition). Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301895

    Original file (ND1301895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she was being processed for discharge for a physical or mental condition prior to her discharge for a pattern of misconduct.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801261

    Original file (ND0801261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Supporting documentation that could have been submitted for consideration by the Board include, but is not limited to: evidence of a verifiable long-term employment record;evidence of a drug-free existence; documentation of educational pursuits; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of continuing volunteer or church service, and documentation of financial stability or evidence of good standing with financial institutions or credit card companies.The Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900577

    Original file (ND0900577.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002045

    Original file (MD1002045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...