Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900023

Original file (ND0900023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20081001

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20000526 - 20010611     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 200 1 0612     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20031022      Highest Rank/Rate: FA
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 30 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 32
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Period of Confinement: 20021006-20021126 (51 DAYS), Discharged in absentia

NJP :     S CM :

SPCM:

- 20021126 :       Art icle 8 6 ( Absent from RTC, Great Lakes, IL 20020212- 20 021006 (236 DAYS /Apprehended ))
         Article 8 6 (A bsent from RTC Great Lakes, IL 20011017-20020125 (100 DAYS /Apprehended )
         Article 86 (A bsent from RTC Great Lakes, IL 20010827-20011015 (49 DAYS /Surrendered )
         Sentence : CONF 51 DAYS RIR E-1 BCD

C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date):        20070405
NDRB Documentary Review Docket Number:   ND06-00883
NDRB Documentary Review Findings:                 Proper as issued and that no change is warranted.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :

Applicant Testified:
Applicant Available for Questions:
Witnesses: Yes
Observers:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 8 September 2004, Article 5815-010, Executing a Dishonorable or Bad Conduct Discharge.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Family issues.
2.       Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date: 2010 1005    Location: Washington D.C.       R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant's clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included one special court-martial for violation o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized absences (UAs) - 3 specifications totaling 385 days ) . The sentence adjudged by the military judge on 26 November 2002 was as follows: reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement for 51 days, and a bad conduct discharge. Pursuant to a letter of 6 February 2003, the record of trial was forwarded to the Navy-Marine Corps Review Activity, Office of the Judge Advocate General and the appellate review was completed on 16 October 2003.

: (Decisional) ( ) PARTIAL RELIEF WARRANTED . The Applicant’s representative is seeking an upgrade to General (Under Honorable Conditions) and contends that the Applicant was under tremendous strain due to the death of his grandfather and illness of his mother at the time he committed the offenses which resulted in his discharge. Additionally, the representative is requesting an upgrade based on the Applicant’s post-service activity and submitted the following documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration: baptismal certificate, certificate of marriage, death certificate of his grandfather, character reference s ( from his wife, cousin, realtor, employer, church member, employer, police detective, city council member and friends), and high school diploma. Additionally, a friend of the Applicant testified on his behalf. The Board determined that an upgrade was warranted based on the Applicant’s testimony, testimony of his friend and other documentary evidence demonstrating his post service accomplishments . The Applicant took responsibility for his actions, admitted to the misconduct and appeared genuinely remorseful. The Board was very impressed with the voluminous documentary evidence of the Applicant’s post-service activities and strong character references. However, the Board determined that in view of the frequency and seriousness of the Applicant's misconduct a change in the discharge characterization to fully honorable is not warranted. .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and basis for discharge, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601020

Original file (ND0601020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USNND06-01020Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060725Narrative Reason for Separation: Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN3620280Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: RTC GREAT LAKES ILApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to:Characterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20 The Discharge shall change : Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:Regarding equity, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600883

Original file (ND0600883.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

030724: NMCCCA: The findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review are affirmed.031016: Appellate review complete.031020: SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed. Relief is not authorized.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901121

Original file (ND0901121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Wants to reenlist and was told he would beeligible for reenlistment into the Navy six months after discharge.2. However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, the Applicant must have a full understanding that post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade.Summary: After a thorough review of...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200642

Original file (ND1200642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601051

Original file (ND0601051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030117Reason for Discharge erroneous entryLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER 20030123Narrative reason directed:ERRONEOUS ENTRYCharacterization directed: UNCHARACTERIZED Date Applicant Discharged: 20030128 Additional...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901987

Original file (ND0901987.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Wants to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION).By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900843

Original file (ND0900843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation:From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601206

Original file (ND0601206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Decisional Issues: The NDRB under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000403Reason for Discharge - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000403Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601142

Original file (ND0601142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020425Reason for Discharge due to: ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENTLeast Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020425Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)20020426GCMCA Review Separation...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102124

Original file (ND1102124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:UNDER MEDICAL CONDITIONS Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20000623 - 20000706Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000707Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20001013Highest Rank/Rate:ANLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 07 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 37EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900023

Similar Decisions