Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902242
Original file (MD0902242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMCR
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090811
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to: NOT SPECIFIED
         Narrative Reason change to: REQUESTED BUT NOT SPECIFIED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19960314 - 19960407     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960408     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19980413      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 27 D a y ( s )
         Active:  Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 11 D a y ( s )

 Education Level:        AFQT: 68
MOS: 0481
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling : 12
- 19970406 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-partici pation for the month of April.
- 19970504 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of May.
- 19970609 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of June.
- 19970810 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of August.
- 19970908 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of September .
- 19971006 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of October.
- 19971122 :       For deficiencies on performance and /or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of November.
- 19971207 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of December.
- 19980112 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of January.
- 19980223 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of February.
- 19980309 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of March.
 - 19980420 :       For deficiencies on performance and/or conduct - Unsat-participation for the month of April.



Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    
         Other Documentation :     


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective
18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve Participation and Administrative Procedures, paragraph 300.

 C. Table 6-1 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995, Guide for Characterization of Service.


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Army National Guard .
 2 . The Appl icant contends his unexcused absences were due to child care issues.

Decision

Date: 2010 0827 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included twelve 6105 counseling warnings for deficiencies on performance and/or conduct when he did not participate in monthly drills, which it was his obligation to do so . Based on the Applicant ’s unexcused absences from drill , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority, and to request an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Army National Guard. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his unexcused absences were due to child care issues. The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s record of service and found that he had over 29 unexcused drills over a one year period. Additionally, the NDRB examined the divorce papers between the Applicant and his wife. It appeared to the Board that the wife had primary care for the child at the time the Applicant was assigned to his Reserve unit. Although the Applicant stated that he had no family in the area to assist him, he did not adequately demonstrate that this was the case. Marine Corps Reserve units are typically very accommodating with rescheduling of reserve drills, particularly those involving child care. The NDRB determined that the discharge was proper and warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews , Reenlistment/RE-code and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00937

    Original file (MD01-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).Issue 1 states: “I believe my discharge was undeserved since it was based entirely on one mistake made during an otherwise honorably served tour.” The NDRB finds the applicant’s issue without merit. The applicant missed 70 reserve drills. The applicant did not provide any of these documents.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00757

    Original file (MD04-00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00202

    Original file (MD04-00202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:Issue 1: “I was recently married at the time and my wife became pregnant. My daughters condition stabilized and my son is in school. Issue 1: The Applicant stated his discharge was unjust because “his (life) had to be redirected” even though “(t)he USMC was important to (him).” The Applicant signed a contract on 970818, while enlisting into the USMCR, that acknowledged his understanding of the requirement to participate in...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00915

    Original file (MD01-00915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that a change be made to the characterization of my discharge due to the fact that I left my unit in the face of injustice. 970606: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. The Board found no evidence of racism against the applicant in a review of his service records.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01381

    Original file (MD03-01381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 961011: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.961103: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation in reserve, specifically failure to attend regular scheduled drills on 961102 and 961103].

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00911

    Original file (MD00-00911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00911 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000712, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I was then re-evaluated about a month later where the Doctor recommended no combat duty. 961208: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00242

    Original file (MD03-00242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00242 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030115, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. “ To Whom It May Concern: The reason I am writing this issue is to inform you why I received a “other than honorable discharge” and request an upgrade to an “honorable discharge”. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01214

    Original file (MD04-01214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00021

    Original file (MD03-00021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00021 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. While the Board commends the Applicant for the positive accomplishments he has made since his discharge, the Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900192

    Original file (MD0900192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board does not consider the Applicant’s request being denied as mistreatment; the Applicant was not in a satisfactory drill status in the spring of 2004 as evidenced by his missed IDTS in February 2004 and therefore was not eligible to transfer until after his missed IDT’s were made up. The NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by...