Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901974

Original file (MD0901974.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090616

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19950729 - 19960715     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960716     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20010206      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 23 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (2)

Periods of UA: 19971124-19971129 (6 days); 19990825-19990908 (14 days); 19990919-19990922 (4 days);
Periods of CONF: 19990927-19991117 (51 days)

NJP:
- 19970221 :       Article (Fail to obey a n order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended: for 1 month

- 19971212 :      Article (U nauthorized absence for 6 days )
         Article ( Fail to obey a n order or regulation)
         A warded : Susp ended:

SCM:

SPCM:
- 19991118 :       Art icle (Unauthorized absence - 2 specifications : one failure to go , the other for 5 days)
         Article 87 (Missing movement)
         Article 92 ( W rongful possession of drug abuse paraphernalia – wooden pipe to smoke marijuana )
         Sentence : for 100 days BCD
         CA Action (20000211) The sentence is approved and, except for BCD, will be executed, but the execution of that part of the sentence extending to all confinement in excess of 60 days is suspended for a period of 12 months.

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ BAD CONDUCT ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :
         Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his misconduct was due to immaturity and inexcusable mistakes.
2. The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration.

Decision

Date: 2010 0617 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severi ty of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant's clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Unauthorized absence for 6 days) and Article (Fail to obey an order or regulation) ; and Special Court-Martial (SPCM) for of the UCMJ: Article (Unauthorized absence - 2 specifications: one failure to go and the other for 5 days), Article 87 (Missing movement) and Article 92 (Wrongful possession of drug abuse paraphernalia – wooden pipe for smoking marijuana). The Applicant did not have a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana, but prior to entering the Marine Corps he acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal U se of Drugs on 20 July 1995 . The Applicant was convicted at a SPCM and was discharged from the Marine Corp s with a Bad Conduct discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his misconduct was due to immaturity and inexcusable mistakes. The NDRB determined that the Applicant's youth or age was no t a mitigating factor in his misconduct and that the discharge received was warranted based on his misconduct. Clemency denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant believes his post-service conduct is worthy of consideration. Although the Applicant states he has been attending college, trying to get a degree in Radiology Technology, and has been a productive adult , he failed to provide any documentary evidence on his behalf for post-service consideration. The NDRB is authorized to consid er post-service factors in consideration if a case warrants clemency . Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for clemency, are co nsidered during Board reviews . Supporting documentation to help support post service clemency includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attending or completion of higher education (official transcripts) and documentation of a drug free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency will be granted, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct justifies clemency . The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. To warrant clemency, the Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced evidence as stated in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the addendum . The NDRB determined the characteriza tion of service received, “Bad Conduct Discharge ”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service d ocumentation provided, clemency would be inappropriate

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews , Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900672

Original file (MD0900672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101476

Original file (MD1101476.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” After considering all the facts and circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s case, the Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged from the Marine Corps with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge due to Misconduct (Pattern of Misconduct and Drug Abuse) with drug abuse being the primary basis. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500350

Original file (MD1500350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative board procedure on 29 March 2012, the Applicant initially exercised his right to request an administrative board and waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. On 05 April 2012, the Applicant was tried at summary court martial and found guilty of Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) for the possession of spice. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201633

Original file (MD1201633.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100110

Original file (MD1100110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900452

Original file (ND0900452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board reviewed the evidence of record, which included the Applicant’s statement, medical records from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, statement of the Applicant’s mother, and other service medical records and concluded there was not a connection between the Applicant’s misconduct and his medical condition. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300299

Original file (MD1300299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. During the Applicant’s four years of service he was found guilty at an NJP of violating UCMJ Article 86, received below-average Proficiency and Conduct marks of 4.1/3.9, and received 10 retention warnings for being UA, assignment to the BCP, failing the PFT and the CFT, lack of financial stability, poor judgment, and disloyal statements. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500942

Original file (MD1500942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900740

Original file (MD0900740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

This type of negative attitude is unacceptable and is not in keeping with the good order and discipline of the U. S. Marine Corps and will not be tolerated.- 20050407:Formy belligerent attitude and disrespectful behavior towards your First Sergeant during an unofficial counseling session. The Board determined the characterization of service received, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved,...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400993

Original file (MD1400993.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning and summary court-martial (SCM) for of the UCMJ:Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications).The Applicant acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 5 February 2008.Based...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901974

Similar Decisions