Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901644

Original file (MD0901644.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090520

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT, OTHER

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19951018 - 19960826     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960827     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19960906      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 10 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 58
MOS: 9900
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /          Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT, OTHER ”


The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :
         Other Documentation :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant states his narrative reason for separation is partially inaccurate and wants it to be corrected.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0225 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT, OTHER.

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances which led to the Applicant’s discharge and the discharge process to ensure the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety were met . Th e Applicant’s record of service included diagnosis by a medical officer for adjustment disorder with depressed mood . The Applicant was brought to the emergency room the day after he arrived at boot camp with superficial lacerations on both wrists. Although the Applicant denied suicidal ideations, the command had him evaluated by a psychiatrist. Based on the medical officer ’ s evaluation, the Applicant was recommended for discharge. Based on the Applicant ’s mental condition , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and to submit a written statement for consideration by the separating authority. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation is partially inaccurate and wants it to reflect only defective enlistment. The Applicant also claims his enlistment and separation were due to an expired green card. The NDRB found the Applicant’s statement not to be necessarily true. The Applicant was discharged due to his mental state. He was described as being extremely immature, having no desire to be a Marine, failure to exert any effort and will ing to say or do anything to get out. The NDRB did determine that an administrative change to the narrative reason for separation would be appropriate to update the DD214 in order to keep in accordance with regulations and to delete extraneous phrases from the original DD214. Although the wording has changed in the narrative reason for separation, the intent of the separation is still valid and warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative r eason for separation shall change to ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT, OTHER. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Addition al Reviews and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16E), effective 15 August 1995 until 31 August 2001, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901641

Original file (MD0901641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall change toERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT, OTHER.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500224

Original file (MD1500224.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Reentry Code change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20021125 - 20030126 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030127 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20030521 Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 25 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: 36 MOS: 9900 Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): Fitness Reports: ...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00490

Original file (ND04-00490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040922. This is why I am seeking an upgrade to an honorable medical discharge on my DD214 and my RE Code on my DD214 to be changed. Age at Entry: 23 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 13 1/2 AFQT: 27 Highest Rate: SR Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: None Behavior: None OTA: None Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501542

Original file (ND0501542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “medically discharged.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant was recommended for Entry Level Medical Separation and instructed to follow-up with known civilian provider. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500685

Original file (MD1500685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The NDRB has no...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700036

Original file (ND0700036.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was processed for discharge under dual reasons of Personality Disorder and Defective Enlistment. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19960216Reason for Discharge - DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19960216Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500575

Original file (ND1500575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Characterization of Service Received: (corrected) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00386

Original file (ND00-00386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND00-00386 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and remove the reason for the discharge. Characterization of service as General is not warranted as the applicant’s active service was only 16 days. The applicant was properly processed for discharge as erroneous enlistment, however, an administrative error on the DD214 states “personality...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400973

Original file (MD1400973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00518

Original file (ND04-00518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to general. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970115 with an entry level separation (uncharacterized) for defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment (A). Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901644

Similar Decisions