Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901596

Original file (MD0901596.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090514

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050425 - 20050523     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050524     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20060419      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 26 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 43
MOS: 3531
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

- 20060307 :       Article , (Wrongful use, possession etc of a controlled substance, 1 specification)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

SCM: SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :

         Other Documentation :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Misconduct was an isolated incident.
2. Applicant never failed a drug test.
3. Believes he was judged based on the activities of other Marines rather than his own actions.
4. Post - service.
5. Reenlistment.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0225 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Wrongful use, possession etc of a controlled substance , : unauthorized use of prescription medication ). The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Marine Corps, acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 20 April 2005 . Based on the Article 112a violation , processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of a dministrative separation processing , the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified coun sel and submit a written statement . The Applicant waived his right to request an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his m isconduct was an isolated incident. The NDRB advises the Applicant despite a service member’s prior record of service certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a sp ecial or general court-martial. However, his command did not pursue a punitive di scharge but opted instead for a more lenient administrative discharge. Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN) , all Marines identified for mandatory processing under the criteria of drug abuse will be processed for administrative separation on the first offense.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he never failed a drug test. The NDRB found this issue to be without merit. The record shows the Applicant received NJP for wrongfully using a prescription medication. Upon notification for administrative separation, the Applicant submitted a voluntary written statement in which he admitted “…to crushing up a painkiller and snorting it myself.” The record is unclear as to the exact circumstances leading up to the Applic ant’s drug abuse charges . However, t he NDRB advises the Applicant a positive urinalysis is not required to substantiate illegal drug usage . Self- admission is one such case. The Applicant was processed for administrative separation in accordance with Marine Corps regulations. The Appl icant could have received a significantly more serious punishment as stated in the NDRB response to i ssue o ne.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because he was judged based on the activities that occurred in Iraq by other Marines rather than his own actions. The record does not reflect any information indicating the Applicant was accidently apprehended, charged or prosecuted as part of a larger group of Marines , and the Applicant provided no documentation of any kind to support his contention. Regardless of how the Applicant’s misconduct was discovered, he admitted to the wrongful use of a controlled substance. The NDRB found the characterization of the Applicant's discharge was equitable , and his separation from the Marine Corps was consistent with others in similar circumstances.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant requested that the NDRB consider post- service conduct as a basis for a mo re thorough understanding of his performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The NDRB considers post-service conduct in order to determine if the misconduct committed during active duty was indicative of the Applicant's character or an aberration. In his application package, the Applicant claims he has completed education and job training and has maintained steady employment. Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he failed to provide any additional documentation and evidence on his behalf to support a post-service conduct review. The Applicant’s statements alone, without sufficient documentary evidence, are not enough to form a basis of relief. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). Additionally, upon receipt of the Applicant's DD Form 293, the NDRB mails an acceptance letter that includes Information Concerning Review Procedures , which discusses the submission of additional documents in paragraph 3, Submission of Evidence , and in the last section on page 4, Information Pertaining to a Review Based Upon Post-Service Conduct . However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, the Applicant must have a full understanding that post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant desires to reenlist in the military. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. The Applicant is referred to the addendum, Reenlistment/RE-code for further information regarding this issue.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000253

Original file (MD1000253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301496

Original file (MD1301496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB also viewed the entire service of the Applicant at his personal hearing and determined that a preponderance of the evidence supported discharge for violation of the Marine Corps drug policy, that separation from the Naval Service was appropriate, and that an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service was warranted.Relief denied. The Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does show he is doing well as a civilian, but it does not...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200892

Original file (MD1200892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:REQUESTED, NOT SPECIFIED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060731 - 20060820Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060821Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060912Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)23 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:33MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness Reports: Awards and...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401284

Original file (MD1401284.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: MISCONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF A DIRECT ORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060817 - 20070805Active:Pre-Service Drug Waiver: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070806Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110408Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)02 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:61MOS: 1391Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200882

Original file (MD1200882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100289

Original file (MD1100289.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The documentation the Applicant submitted along with the DD Form 293 was not sufficient for the Board to evaluate his post-service character and conduct. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100857

Original file (MD1100857.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901532

Original file (MD0901532.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, according to the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual,separation for a Marine in entry-level status shall be uncharacterized when characterization of service under other than honorable conditions is not warranted. Based on the limited post service documentation provided, an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901031

Original file (MD0901031.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, and the narrative reason for separation shall remain Misconduct. ...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901208

Original file (MD0901208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901596

Similar Decisions