Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901523

Original file (MD0901523.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090512

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19951019 - 19960219     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960220     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20000626      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 07 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 41
MOS: 0151
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle LoC LoA (2)

NJP:

- 19970425 :      Article 86 (UA failure to go to or leave place of duty )
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated: RIR FOP (19970716)

- 19980209 :      Arti cle 86 ( UA failure to got o appointed place of duty Alcohol Treatment Facility ) , 2 specifications
         Article 91 (Disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer)
         Article 134 (Drunk and disorderly)
         Awarded: CCU 20 days Suspended:

- 19980915 :      Article 86 ( UA absent from appointed place of duty ) , 3 specifications
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

- 19981117 :      Article 86 (UA failure to go to appointed place of duty , restriction muster), 2 specifications
         Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order by drinking while on restriction)
         Article 112a (Wrongfully use marijuana)
         Sentence : BCD 47 days ( 19981001 – 19981116, 46 days )
         CA’s Action: Period of pretrial confinement credited toward the period of confinement approved.

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19960805 :       For underage alcohol related incident.

- 19961011 :      For failure to be at appointed place at appointed time.

- 19970808 :      For showing up to work while under the influence of alcohol, confirmed by an alcohol test.

- 19971215 :      For drunk and disorderly alcohol related incident.

- 19980305 :      For unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty.

- 19980820 :      For habitual unauthorized absences from appointed places of duty.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :

         Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Wants to further his education and become a wildlife federal officer.
2 . Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0204 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT-MARTIAL .

Discussion

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant's clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, non-judicial punishments (NJPs) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized absences (U A s) – 6 specifications ), Article 91 ( Disrespectful in language toward a noncommissioned officer), and Article 134 ( Drunk and disorderly conduct) ; and special court-martial (SPCM) for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (UAs) Failure to go to appointed place of duty – 2 specifications) , Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order by drinking while on restriction), and Article 112a (Wrongful use of marijuana) . The Applicant acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 18 October 1995 . The sentence adjudged on 17 November 1998 was as follows: forfeiture of $627.00 pay per month for two months, confinement for 47 days, and a bad conduct discharge. Per the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals decision of 29 October 1999, the findings and sentence were affirmed as approved .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant is seeking an upgrade in the characterization of his service to further his education. Additionally, he hopes to become a wildlife federal officer in Florida. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: ( Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends since being separated he has no criminal record, driving under the influence charges and wants to carry on in peace and become a wildlife federal officer in Florida . He submitted a resume’ for the Board’s consideration. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and statement of post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and basis for discharge, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900361

Original file (MD0900361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Reenlistment opportunity. The NDRB determined clemency was not warranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901203

Original file (MD0901203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Nondecisional)The Applicant claims his current medical problems are related to his service in the Marine Corps and requests an upgrade of the characterization of his service so he can receive medical treatment from the Department of Veterans Affairs. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, court-martial proceedings, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700183

Original file (ND0700183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100113

Original file (MD1100113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801649

Original file (MD0801649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a personal statement and as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901656

Original file (MD0901656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

He was reduced in rank to E-1, confined, and given with a Bad Conduct discharge.Issue 1: (Decisional) () . Considering this, the NDRB felt relief was not warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD CONDUCT and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900593

Original file (MD0900593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902227

Original file (MD0902227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant believes his discharge characterization was too harsh and he was treated unfairly by his command. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s alcohol did not serve as mitigation to the numerous infractions within his record.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process,...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900438

Original file (MD0900438.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19980324 - 19981117Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19981118Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20021117Highest Rank: NFIRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:49MOS: 0621Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):4.0(NFIR)/3.8(NFIR)Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902090

Original file (MD0902090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the Applicant’s marital problems were not mitigating factors in his misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901523

Similar Decisions