Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901373
Original file (MD0901373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090423
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19920828 - 19930614     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19930615     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19950612      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 29 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 36
MOS: 0311
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 19941229 :      Article (Absence without leave – UA) , 2 specifications
          Specification 1: 19940927 – 19941026, 30 days
         Specification 2: 19941202 – 19941211, 10 days
         Awarded: Suspended: Vacated: 19950301

- 19950301 :      Article (Absence without leave – UA 0730 – 0830, 19950207)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19941227 :      For antisocial personality disorder and alcohol dependence.


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”
         “ ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:            Service / Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:     
         Additional Statements :
                   From Applicant:            From Representat ion :               From Congress member :    

         Other Documentation :     

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 June 1989 until 17 August 1995.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant contends he never used illegal drugs while on active duty, and never had a positive urinalysis test.

2. The Applicant requested that the NDRB consider post service conduct as a basis for a more thorough understanding of his performance and conduct during the period of service under review .

Decision

 Date : 2011 0328             Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.

The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings , and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( , ). The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver. The Applicant’s acknowledgment of complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs was not found in the record . Based on the Applicant’s self admission to drug use while on active duty, in violation of Article 112a (Wrongful, use possession etc of a controlled substance) , command administratively processed for separation. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory. When notified of administrative separation processing , the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, to submit a written statement, or to request an administrative board hearing .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he never used illegal drugs while on active duty, and never had a positive urinalysis test. The record shows the Applicant admitted to using illegal drugs while on active duty during a psychological evaluation. This disclosure required mandatory processing for administrative separation. Additionally, the Applicant ’s record of service was marred with two NJP’s for unauthorized absence s (UA). One of these periods was for thirty days for which he was declared a deserter, which constitutes the commission of a serious offense.

C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Marine Corps in order to maintain good order and discipline ; violation of Article 112(a) and Article 86 (for 30 days or more) . This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge, and possible confinement , if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The Applicant’s command did not pursue a punitive di scharge but instead , opted for the more lenient administrative discharge process . The NDRB carefully considered the Applicant’s testimony, and contention he never used drugs while on active duty. However, due to the overwhelming documented evidence in the record, the NDRB was unable to find this testimony credible. Therefore, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant requested that the NDRB consider post service conduct as a basis for a more thorough understanding of his performance and conduct during the period of service under review . The Applicant submitted considerable documentation of his post-service accomplishments including: educational pursuits, criminal background check, verification of employment, drug testing information, and credit information. The NDRB carefully considered the Applicant’s post-service accomplishments , along with his testimony, the testimony of his witness, and his military medical and service record s . While the NDRB found the Applicant’s post-service conduct to be noteworthy, it was not sufficient to overcome the serious nature of the misconduct of record. The NDRB determined that a n upgrade would be inappropriate. Accordingly, relief denied.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s personal testimoney , his summary of service, record entries, and the discharge process, the NDRB found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

 Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001336

    Original file (ND1001336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400377

    Original file (MD1400377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service did not document if she hada pre-service drug waiver prior to entering the Marine Corpsor acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs.When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure for Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and Misconduct (Serious Offense), the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and requestan administrative board.The Applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101138

    Original file (MD1101138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00877

    Original file (ND04-00877.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the reason for the discharge be changed to “ Administrative – RE-1. “Distinguished members of the board;I believe my discharge was inequitable because I provided substantial evidence with the testimony of the witness stating he had given me a cigarette mixed with a drug. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000880

    Original file (ND1000880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900164

    Original file (MD0900164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900008

    Original file (MD0900008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901648

    Original file (MD0901648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900457

    Original file (ND0900457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the Applicant's conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflected a significant departure from the conduct expected of a service member and an upgrade to Honorable would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002279

    Original file (MD1002279.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation was mandatory per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN).The Applicant’s reserve unit attempted to notify him of administrative separation processinginperson (5 Nov 94) and via mail (4 Dec 94) using the procedure. The Applicant’s misconduct dictated that he receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge at the time of his separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...