Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901239

Original file (MD0901239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090407

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: RESIGNATION - UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT
Authority for Discharge: SECNAVINST 1920.6B

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR     20012 2 2 - 20010603      Active: R         20010604 - 20010809

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Appointment : 20010810    Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Indefinite
Date of Discharge: 20031120      H ighest Rank: 2nd Lt
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 11 D a y ( s )
Education Level: BS
MOS: 9901
Officer Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:
- 20021218 :       Article 107 (False official statement)
         Article 133 (Conduct unbecoming an officer )
         Awarded : Letter of Censure Appealed 20020110 Appeal denied 20030207

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :

         Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 13 Dec 1999 until 14 December 2005 establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 Mar 97.

B . Chapter 4, Paragraph 4104 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F) effective
1 September 2001 until Present, RETIREMENT OR RESIGNATION .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Wants to get commissioned in the Army a s a Physician Assistant .
2 . Post-service conduct warrants consideration.

Decision

Date : 20 0 9 1217 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall RESIGNATION – UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included non-judicial punishment ( ) for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 107 ( False official statement, lying to her company commander by using her sick mother as justification for personal financial gain) and Article 133 ( Conduct unbecoming an officer ) . F or her actions , she was given a punitive letter of repr imand . The Applicant requested resignation for cause with the understanding that she would receive a general discharge based on the offenses committed, and in lieu of further processing for administrate separation for cause. The Applicant’s request was approved on October 16, 2003 by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant is requesting an upgrade in order to attain a commissioned in th e Army as a Physician Assistant . Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records ( BCNR ) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

Issue 2 : (Decisional) ( ) . In addition to her DD Form 293 (application for discharge upgrade) , the Applicant provided a combat medic and emergency medica l technician ’ s (EMT) diploma, a copy of her M aster ’ s of Science degree with her transcript from the University of Phoenix , and enlistment document s for the Army National Guard . While the Board app reciates the Applicant’s efforts to overcome her discharge from the Marine Corps , the members determined that h er efforts need s to be more encompassing and thoroughly documented. Additionally, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on h er post-service conduct, she should note that post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain RESIGNATION - UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901503

Original file (MD0901503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The fact that the command referred charges to a General Court-Martial, the NDRB determined that the charges against the Applicant substantiated his unacceptable conduct as an officer. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400234

Original file (MD1400234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s administrative separation package, which included his qualified resignation request, was properly submitted up the Applicant’s chain of command and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) with a narrative reason of Unacceptable Conduct and a corresponding Separation Code of BNC1.The Applicant submitted a request for a qualified resignation, and the Separation Code FND applies only to unqualified resignations. Relief denied.Summary:...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000114

Original file (MD1000114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain RESIGNATION UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900715

Original file (MD0900715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20010112 - 20010526Active:USMCR (School) 20010527-20041008 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment: 20041009Age at Enlistment: Years Contracted: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20081121Highest Rank: 1stLtLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)13 Day(s)Education Level: MOS: 3002Officer’s Fitness reports: All officer performance...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001600

Original file (MD1001600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The NDRB found the Applicant’s misconduct of record to be far outside the bounds considered acceptable for a Marine officer. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600629

Original file (MD0600629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The reasons for the Applicant’s separation are misconduct, specifically, unauthorized absence and failure to demonstrate acceptable qualities of a leader.040726: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to tender a resignation.040806: Commanding Officer, The Basic School, Report of NJP and Request for Administrative Separation in the Case of Second Lieutenant D_ E. __ (Applicant). If his resignation is not accepted, I recommend he be involuntarily separated...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700491

Original file (ND0700491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

To change the narrative reason separation would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant)to rebut the presumption. Awarded –punitive letter ofreprimand.20040917: Applicant issued punitive letter of reprimand by Commanding Officer of US Naval Hospital Sigonella.20041014: Applicant submitted a qualified resignation which...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000901

Original file (ND1000901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020715 - 20021103Active:20021104 - 20050804 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Appointment: 20050805Age: Years Contracted: IndefiniteDate of Discharge: 20070222Highest Rank: ENSLength of Service: 01 Year(s) Month(s) 19 Day(s) Education Level: AFQT: 91Officer’s Fitness reports: AvailableAwards and Decorations (per DD 214): FLOCPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00895

Original file (MD04-00895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Recommended administrative separation. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violating orders, assault upon a fellow officer, and conduct unbecoming an officer.
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801072

Original file (MD0801072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The CA, per the requirements set out in paragraph 4003 of MCO P5800.16A (Marine Corps Manual for Legal Administration) forwarded the report of NJP to CMC (JAM), with the recommendation the applicant's letter of resignation be accepted and the Applicant be discharged with a “ General (Under Honorable Conditions)” characterization of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901239

Similar Decisions