Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901036

Original file (MD0901036.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090316
Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USMCR (DEP)      20040611 - 20040802     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20040803      Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20071003       H ighest Rank:
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 01 D ay(s)
Education Level:         AFQT: 53
MOS: 3043
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )   Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):

Periods of UA/CONF: UA: 20070314-20070320 (7 days); 20070625-20070726 (32 days)

NJP:

SCM:

- 20070531 :      Article 86 (UA -abandoning watch or guard duty)
         Sentence: CONF FOR 29 DAYS (20070531-20070623 (24 days))

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20070226 :      For your assignment to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program (BCP). Specifically, you have failed to properly meet and maintain your body composition standards as required by MCO P6100.12 and were not found within standards during the Battalion’s Body Composition Evaluation (BCE testing. Your actions are unsatisfactory and not in accordance with the high state of readiness required by the USMC.

- 20070515 :      For our assignment to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program (BCP). Specifically, you have failed to make satisfactory progress during your second month of assignment, 20070401 to 20070430. Your initial weight was 224 pounds with 20 percent body fat and your current weight is 229 pounds with 23 percent body fat. You have gained 5 pounds and 3 percent body fat during this month. Additionally, you failed the physical fitness test administered on 20070501 by finishing the run portion of the event in 33 minutes and 48 seconds. Your actions are unsatisfactory and not in accordance with the high state of readiness required by the USMC.

- 20070828 :      For my summary court martial received on 20070531, for violation of Article 86, unauthorized absence from 20070626 to 20070726.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:         Service/Medical Record: Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements:
From Applicant:         From Representation:     From Congress member:

Other Documentation:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

D. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (UA, more than 30 days).

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Asking for a discharge upgrade to Honorable because of the physical and mental abuse I received while serving in the United States Marines Corps.

Decision

Date: 2009 0917 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and summary court-martial ( ) for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (UA, abandoning watch or guard duty). In addition, the Applicant had additional UA’s of 7 days and 32 days that were not adjudicated. Based on the offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. Based on the Commanding General, Marine Corps Combined Arms Training Center letter 1900 Ser Adj of 27 August 2007, the Applicant requested separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial and his request was accepted. When a member requests separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, the member admits his guilt and acknowledges his understanding that if his discharge is Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, it may deprive him of virtually all veterans benefits based upon his current period of active service, and that he may expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered in any branch of the Armed Forces or the character of discharge received there from may have a bearing.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the characterization of his discharge should be upgraded to Honorable because of the physical and mental abuse he allegedly received while serving in the United States Marines Corps. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he was physically or mental abused while in the Marine Corps. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

Information retrieved from the Applicant’s medical records, the Applicant was being seen by a staff psychiatrist for feeling depressed and for suicidal ideation because his ex-girlfriend was having an abortion against his wishes, and that he was “doomed to hell” for it. During the evaluation, he denied having any other events or stressors and that he enjoys his job. No mention of being physically and mentally abused was made during this evaluation, nor was there any documentation anywhere else in his medical or service records indicating such treatment.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .]

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901793

Original file (MD0901793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 28 March 2008, eight months into the BCP program, the Applicant was 197 pounds and 22 percent body fat, still five pounds and four percent body fat over the maximum allowable standard. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401194

Original file (MD1401194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900290

Original file (MD0900290.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, by unanimous vote, the narrative reason for the discharge, “Condition not a disability” shall remain as issued. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900288

Original file (MD0900288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE.Discussion :().The Applicant contends after 12 plus years of decorated and faithful service, he believes his discharge, due to weight control, does not rate a “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” and his misconduct was due to mitigating circumstances (family issues). The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902230

Original file (MD0902230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900488

Original file (MD0900488.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable based on the fact he was involuntarily discharged from the Marine Corps due to a condition not a disability. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901360

Original file (MD0901360.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030924 - 20040426 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20040427Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20060921 Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s)26 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT: 34 MOS: 0161 Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): () / () Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900165

Original file (MD0900165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the Applicant completed his obligated period of service and is therefore entitled to an upgrade of his discharge to “Honorable” and a change to the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority. ” However, because of the noted repeated minor misconduct the NDRB does not recommend or support a change to the Applicant’s reentry code.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300673

Original file (MD1300673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6215, WEIGHT...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400220

Original file (MD1400220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on the Applicant’s unsatisfactory performance by failing to achieve Marine Corps weight and body fat percentage standards, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901036

Similar Decisions