Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900687

Original file (MD0900687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

, ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090130

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: FAILURE TO CONFORM TO WEIGHT STANDARDS
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19960625 - 19961203     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19961204     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20000301      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 27 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 51
MOS: 3531
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 4.1/3.0 (Extracted from Recommendation for Administrative Discharge
worksheet dated 3 February 2000.)

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19990809 :       For failure to maintain height and weight standards.

- 19980723 :       For failure to maintain good order and discipline while on liberty..

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:      Service / Medical Record: Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Related to Post-Service Period (cont):

Additional Statements :
From Applicant:         From Representat ion : From Congress member :

Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6215, WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Record of service.
2. No misconduct.
3. Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 0507 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE .

Discussion

: ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade due to his record of service which did not include any misconduct. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service does not indicate any NJP or court-martial convictions for misconduct. However, the record does indicate significant evidence of sub-standard conduct and performance of military duties. Specifically, the Applicant’s average proficiency and conduct marks during his enlistment were 4.1 and 3.0, respectively. The Applicant was also administratively reduced in rank from Lance Corporal to Private First Class on 30 June 1999 due to professional incompetence. For the edification of the Applicant, t he Marine Corps Separations and Retirement Manual (MCO P1900.16F) directs that Marines at their end of their active service be given a “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” characterization of service when their average proficiency and conduct marks are below 3.0 and 4.0, respectively. The command may determine an “Honorable” characterization is warranted only in cases when the Marine’ service is so meritorious that any other characterization would clearly be inappropriate. The NDRB determined the characterization awarded, “General (Under Honorable Conditions),” accurately reflects the overall characterization of the Applicant’s service; an upgrade would be inappropriate.

: ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade because of his post-service conduct. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; and documentation of a drug - free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

The Applicant provided statements in his DD-293 Application claiming educational pursuits, non-involvement with civil authorities, and owing his own business. While the Board applauds the Applicant’s post service efforts, the Board determined the evidence of post-service conduct is not sufficient to warrant a discharge upgrade. To warrant an upgrade the Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing and documented . The Applicant could have produced

additional evidence as stated in the above paragraph with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. T he Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial fo r misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101084

Original file (MD1101084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900854

Original file (MD0900854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20030929 - 20031116Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031117Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060921Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)05 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:43MOS: 1345Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):4.1(5)/3.9(5)Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300961

Original file (MD1300961.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. In accordance with the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MARCORSEPMAN), the characterization of service for administrative separations due to Weight Control Failure will be Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) as warranted by the member’s service record. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100420

Original file (MD1100420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101960

Original file (MD1101960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s Pro/Con mark evaluation average, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon separation was equitable per the applicable orders and directives in effect at the time of his separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service and record entries, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900209

Original file (MD0900209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board applauds the Applicant’s service to his country, but has determined the characterization, General (Under Honorable Conditions), was an appropriate discharge based on a full review of his record of service. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000102

Original file (MD1000102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Commanders are to base the new period’s evaluation markings on the performance and conduct in the current grade.Additionally, the assignment of any conduct markings below 4.0, for any reason other than court-martial or reduction at NJP, requires documentation in the service member’s service record book. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101328

Original file (MD1101328.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20000428 - 20000613Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000614Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20030611Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:62MOS: 4641Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002029

Original file (MD1002029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the Applicant’s characterization of service will change to Honorable in the interest of equity, with no change to the narrative reason for separation.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100550

Original file (MD1100550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900687

Similar Decisions