Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801739

Original file (ND0801739.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MM3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20080818

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 20000929 - 20010214                 Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20010215      Period of E nlistment : Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20050707
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 03 D a ys        Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 31
Highest Rank /Rate :       MM3       Evaluation M arks: Performance:    3.0 ( 1 ) Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )         OTA: 3.00
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2)

Periods of UA : 20040517-20040805 ( 81 days)
20040907 - 20050523 ( 259 days)

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C : Retention Warnings:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

                  - Letter from L . O. G . , United States Senator dated 20041116

Other Documentation (Describe) :

                  - Letter from Navy Personnel Command of 20041104

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Education opportunities.
2. Record of service.
3. Applicant wanted to get out of the Navy as a conscientious objector.

Decision

Date: 20 08 1121 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF COURT-MARTIAL .

Discussion

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding .

: ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade due to his record of service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by a violation of the Uniform code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (UA), one for 81 days and the other for 259 days: The cumulative time in a UA status was 340 days. Upon the voluntary request of the Applicant, the command elected not to prosecute the Applicant by Court-Martial for violation of Article 86 (U A ) in exchange for an administrative discharge with an “Under Other Than Honorable” conditions characterization of service. Violation of Article 86 for periods greater than 30 days is considered a serious offense, punishable by punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated and awarded by a special or general court-martial. For the edification of the Applicant, a n “Under Other Than Honorable” conditions discharge is appropriate when the basis for separation is commission or omission of an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a service member. The NDRB determined the characterization awarded upon discharge was equitable; an upgrade based on his record of service would be inappropriate.

: ( ) . The Applicant appears to contend he is entitled to a discharge upgrade due to his attempts to be discharged from the Navy as a conscientious objector. The record of evidence does not indicate the Applicant ever requested discharge or assignment to non-combatant duties in accordance with Article 1910-020 of the MILPERSMAN. The NDRB therefore rejects the Applicant’s contention as without merit. The awarded discharge was appropriate and a n upgrade would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000561

Original file (MD1000561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20021212 - 20030406Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20031225Age at Enlistment: 20Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20050401Highest Rank:Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s)7 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:31MOS: 0341/8911Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):2.1()/1.4()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800353

Original file (ND0800353.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason Change Decision Date: 20080314Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL.Discussion Issue 1: The Applicant implies that he was treated unfairly by his command due to his Conscientious Objector request not being favorably considered. An upgrade to General under honorable conditions would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800728

Original file (ND0800728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the lack of evidence submitted by the Applicant, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500797

Original file (ND1500797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Based on the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902361

Original file (ND0902361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700050

Original file (ND0700050 .rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800188

Original file (ND0800188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19950131 - 19950824Active: 19950825 -19990920 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990921Period of enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20020708Length of Service: Yrs Mths18 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 34Highest Rank/Rate:MM3Evaluation marks: NONE FOUND IN RECORDAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol Periods...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700113

Original file (ND0700113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIALDischarge Process Date Charge(s) Preferred: 20020930Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 86:: Unauthorized absence from 0445, 20020107 until 0900, 20020924 (259 days/apprehended).Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20020930 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Separation Authority...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801022

Original file (ND0801022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DD Form 149 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900700

Original file (ND0900700.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In fact, the Applicant must have had legal representation in order to properly undergo the request for a separation in lieu of trial by court-martial to his command. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801739

Similar Decisions