Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801701
Original file (ND0801701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HM3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080812
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (DRUG ABUSE)
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20010914 - 20011210     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20011211     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20060727      Highest Rank/Rate: HM3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 80
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.3 ( 3 )         OTA: 3. 1 9

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :
- 20030425 :       Art icle 107 (False official statement)
         Article 134 (False pretense)
         Awarded : Susp ended :

S CM :    SPCM:    C C : Retention Warning Counseling:

NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date):        20080131
NDRB Documentary Review Docket Number:   ND07-00599
NDRB Documentary Review Findings:                 Proper as issued and that no change is warranted.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

Applicant Testified:
Applicant Available for Questions:
Witnesses:
Observers:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 3 May 2005 until Present, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Claims that the General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge does not accurately reflect his character of service.
2. Seeks p ost-service conduct consideration .

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 1028             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :


By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall (DRUG ABUSE) .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service includes for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 107 (False official statement) and Article 134 (False pretense). The evidence of record also contains a Federal Bureau of Investigation Identificat ion Record of 19 September 2001 , which indicates between the period of November 1990 and March 1991 the Applicant: 1) had several felony convi ction s for possession of cocaine or possession with intent to sell /deliver , 2) had a felony convict ion for hallucinogen –traffic, a n d 3) was arrested for disorderly conduct.

T he App licant’s Record of Military Processing, DD Form 1966, indicates that he checked “no” in response to question 26 , Have you ever tried, used, sold, supplied or possessed any narcotics, depressant, stimulant, hallucinogen, cannabis, or any mind altering substance, except as prescribed by a licensed physician? Additionally, the Applicant completed the Office of Personnel Management Security Clearance Application o f 14 September 2001 and denied ever being charged with or convicted of any felony, alcohol or drug related offense (s ee questions 21 – 24 on page 5 ) . The Applicant also completed a n Electronic Personnel Security Questionnaire SF 86 Worksheet , wherein he denied using drug s si nce age 16 or within the past 7 years.

Per the Commander ’s ( Navy Personnel Command ) letter of 2 November 2005 , the Applicant’s command was notified that he failed to disclose his drug involvement upon enlisting in the Navy and directed th e following: 1) that the police report be reviewed with the Applicant , 2) that he be processed for f raudulent e nlistment , or 3) that the command request a waiver. On 4 May 2006 the Applicant was notified of administrative separation processing due to f raudule nt e nlistment and elected to consult with counsel, submit written statements for consideration by the separation authority and o b tain copies of documents that would be forwarded to the separation authority. Pursuant to a letter of 17 July 2006 , t he Commanding Officer , 2nd Medical Battalion directed that the Applicant be discharged due to fraudulent e nlistment with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions).

: (Decisional) ( ) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant’ s representative contends that the General (Under Honorable Conditions) does not accurately reflect his characterization of service. The Applicant admitted to misconduct ( obtain ed meals at the galley under false pretense s) , took responsibility for his behavior and asked the Board to consider his time in serv ice ( almost five years ) and complet ion of two deployments in Iraq prior to being involuntarily separated from the Navy. The Board appreciates the Applicant ’s service to our country ; h owever, the Board determined that there was sufficient evidence to support a discharge based on fraudulent enlistment . Additionally, the Board determined that an upgrade is not warranted , taking into consideration the seriousness of the offenses committed by the Applicant and his failure to disclose his pre-service criminal record , which included numerous arrest s and felony convictions for illegal drugs , as prev iously discussed.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant’s representative is also requesting an upgrade to Honorable based on the Ap plicant’s post service conduct. The following evidence was submitted for the Board’s consideration: 1) testimony of the Applicant on his academic accomplishments (graduated college Magna C um Laude ) , financial support of his son, work history, and community service ; 2 ) college transcripts ; 3) a letter of recognition of July 2009 for completion of the State of North Carolina Guardian Ad Litem Program ; 4) a criminal background check of July 2008 ; and , 5) a character reference . While the Board app reciates the Applicant’s post-service efforts, the Board determined the Applicant’ s post-service document ed evidence was insufficient to form a basis of relief. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate s or relate s directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request). Additionally, upon receipt of the Applicant's DD Form 293, the NDRB mails an acceptance letter that includes Information Concerning Review Procedures , which discusses the submission of additional documents in paragraph 3, Submission of Evidence , and in the last section on page 4, Information Pertaining to a Review Based Upon Post-Service Conduct . However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, the Applicant must have a full understanding that post-service conduct documentation alone does not guarantee an upgrade.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700599

    Original file (ND0700599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20010914 - 20011210Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20011211Period of enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge:20060727Length of Service: Yrs Mths17 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 80Highest Rank/Rate:HM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.33(3) Behavior:3.33(3)OTA: 3.20Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle Pistol Periods...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901147

    Original file (ND0901147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902498

    Original file (ND0902498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s in-service medical record, the NDRB determined the Applicant was not discharged under false pretense and the awarded characterization of service, Uncharacterized, was appropriate based on having less than 180 days of continuous active duty.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801573

    Original file (ND0801573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    An “Under Other Than Honorable” conditions discharge is appropriate when the basis for separation is commission or omission of an act that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected from a service member. The Board determined based on the lack of post service documentation provided and the circumstances surrounding enlistment that an upgrade would be inappropriate and the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable”, was an appropriate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901456

    Original file (ND0901456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300431

    Original file (MD1300431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901716

    Original file (ND0901716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901855

    Original file (ND0901855.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.Summary: Although the Applicant did not state any issues regarding equity or propriety for the Board to consider, the Board carefully examined his military record. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801673

    Original file (ND0801673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant submitted no documentary evidence to support his claim of good post-service conduct. Based on the lack of post-service documentation, the NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901971

    Original file (MD0901971.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time...