Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801571
Original file (ND0801571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080721
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3640420

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to :
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 19910207 - 19910513                 Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19910504     Period of E nlistment : Years Extension         Date of Discharge: 19980728
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 21 D a ys     Education Level:        Age at Enlistment:      AFQT: 52
Highest Rank /Rate : FN     Evaluation M arks: Performance: 3.4 ( 3 )          Behavior: 3.6 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.60
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF : 19940701-19970425 (1,030 days)

NJP : S CM : CC: Retention Warnings:

SPCM: 1
- 19970630 : Art icle 86 ( U A), 19940701-19970425 (1,030 days)
Sentence : BCD; RIR E-1 ; FOP $600/MONTH FOR 3 MONTHS

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

                  -Record of trial dated 30 June 1997
Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Other Documentation (Describe) :





DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Isolated incident.
2 . Not in good mental health at time.

Decision

Date: 20 08 1030             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT MARTIAL .
Discussion

 : (Clemency) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the sev erity of the punishment imposed. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency.

The Applicant contends h er discharge should be changed to an “Uncharacterized” discharge based on her record of service which was good apart from a single period of misconduct. The Applicant further contends she was in circumstances which prevented her clear thought. For the edification of the Applicant, d espite a Sailor’s prior record of se rvice certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the n aval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Additionally, an “Uncharacterized” discharge is used for service members who are discharged while still in an entry level status (within the first 180 days of continuous active duty service) and when the separation does not involve misconduct or when the characterization “Under Other Than Honorable” is warranted. The Applicant is outside the parameters for an “Uncharacterized” discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (UA), for 1,030 days. This excessive period of UA earned a punitive discharge awarded by a Special Court Martial. The Applicant submitted no evidence showing she was not legally responsible for her actions or should not be held accountable for her actions.

The NDRB is authorized to consid er post-service factors in consideration if a case warrants clemency . Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for clemency, are co nsidered during Board reviews . Supporting documentation to help support post service clemency includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record ; documentation of community or church service ; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities ; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s, or other financial institutions; character witness statements; and documentation of a drug free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency will be granted, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case - by - case basis to determine if post service conduct justifies clemency .

The Applicant submitted only a statement she has not been convicted of anything since her release from active duty. Applicant’s efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced e vidence as stated above to help substantiate his case as statements alone from the Applicant cannot be used as the sole justification for the Board to reach a clemency decision. The Board determined the Applicant’s statement does not meet the high standard required to warrant clemency to receive a change.



After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense s s he committed.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 96 until
14 December 1998, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE
OF COURT-MARTIAL

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701120

    Original file (ND0701120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that discharge awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800683

    Original file (ND0800683.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Applicant is advised completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct warrants clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200426

    Original file (ND1200426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19871207 - 19880814Active:19880815 - 19920812 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19920813Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: Years17MONTHS ExtensionDate of Discharge:19980310Highest Rank/Rate:AS2Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 26 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 69EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(7)Behavior:4.0(8)OTA: 3.98Awards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101949

    Original file (ND1101949.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the Applicant’s conductreflected a significant departure from the conduct expected of a servicemember and that clemency was not warranted.Clemency denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.Since 15 years have elapsed since the date of her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800886

    Original file (ND0800886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She has submitted her resume, a personal statement, several character references and records from University of Phoenix as matters for clemency consideration by the NDRB.After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issue submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined clemency was not warranted based on post service conduct and the sentence awarded the Applicant at her court-martial was appropriate for the offenses she committed; an upgrade at this time would be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101572

    Original file (ND1101572.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200592

    Original file (ND1200592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB found that this issue did not warrant clemency. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700800

    Original file (ND0700800.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    94-921 Applicant Discharged: 19940915 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board Related to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representative: Other Documentation (Describe) Pertinent Regulation/Law A. You may view DoD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701070

    Original file (ND0701070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701237

    Original file (ND0701237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19910628 - 19920107Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19920107Period of enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge:19931228Length of Service: Yrs Mths16 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 63Highest Rank/Rate:MSSNEvaluation marks:Performance: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle Pistol Periods of...