Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801561
Original file (ND0801561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ABFAA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080718
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: DRUG ABUSE
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 20031029 - 20040628                 Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20040629     Period of E nlistment : Years Extension         Date of Discharge: 20060714
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 16 D a ys Education Level: Age at Enlistment:      
Highest Rank /Rate :       AN        Evaluation M arks: Performance:    NFIR      Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR AFQT: NFIR
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NDSM SSDR GWOTEM GWOTSM NER (2) HSM


NJP :
- 20060523 : Art icle 112A ( Drug use, w rongful use of a controlled substance, marijuana)
Awarded : Susp ended :

S CM : SPCM: Retention Warnings:

C C :
- 20050901 : Offense: Reckless driving.
Sentence : $150.00 fine ; plus $61.00 court cost.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Other Documentation (Describe) :





DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Discharge based on one isolated incident in 25 months of service.

Decision

Date: 20 08 1106             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE) .
Discussion

 : ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded because it was based on one isolated incident within 25 months of service without other adverse action. The NDRB advises the Applicant that despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant presented no evidence of post service conduct or documentation in support of his request for an upgrade for the Board’s consideration. The Applicant's misconduct is documented in his service record, which is marred by the finding at a N JP proceeding on 23 May 2006 for a violation of the U niform C oder of M ilitary J ustice (UCMJ): Article 112a (Drug use, w rongful use of a controlled substance, marijuana ) . He also received a prior civil conviction on 01 September 2005 for reckless driving . Although the involuntary discharge due to misconduct may seem harsh, it was the result of abuse of a controlled substance. Individuals are indoctrinated from the day of recruitment and have had the U. S. Navy’s drug policy and zero tolerance for substance abuse reinforced through annual Navy-wide training sessions throughout their enlistment . Violations of this policy result in mandatory processing for administrative separation which usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge. T he Applicant’s contention he only had one isolated incident is contradicted by the a fore mentioned evidence which indicates he had a civilian conviction and an NJP for drug abuse during this enlistment. T he Board determined the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature and seriousness of the Applicant’s misconduct . Additionally, due to the lack of mitigating evidence or post-service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 11 2a, Drug abuse.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801376

    Original file (ND0801376.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20050521 - 20051205Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20051206Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070307Length of Service: YearMonths02 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT:75Highest Rank/Rate:ETXNEvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIR Behavior:NFIROTA:NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801439

    Original file (ND0801439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB advises the Applicant that despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline.However, in the Applicant case, the evidence reflects he committed numerous offenses during this enlistment, thus contradicting his allegation the discharge is based on one isolated incident.The Applicant's misconduct is documented in his service record, which is marred by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900852

    Original file (MD0900852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901264

    Original file (ND0901264.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation:From Congress member: Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. The Board determined the characterization of service received,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801627

    Original file (ND0801627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900162

    Original file (ND0900162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service, grade or record of service. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801767

    Original file (MD0801767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion :().The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded based on his isolated misconduct in an otherwise honorable record of service. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was processed in a timely manner, especially in light of the events which occurred between his NJP and his discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801064

    Original file (MD0801064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990317 - 19990608Active: 19990609 - 20031218 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031219Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060501Length of Service: Yrs Mths22 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 55MOS: 6154Highest Rank: Fitness Reports: Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): 4.3/4.3 (NFIR)Awards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900641

    Original file (ND0900641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20070117 - 20070212Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070213Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080222Highest Rank/Rate:SKSNLength of Service: YearMonth(s)10 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 55EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801432

    Original file (ND0801432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.Besides the personal statement provided on the DD Form-293, the Applicant provided additional statements and evidence of good deeds. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other...