Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800908
Original file (ND0800908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080311
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP) 20030530 - 20031209                 Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20031210      Period of E nlistment : Years Extension   Date of Discharge: 20060821
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 12 D a ys         Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 59
Highest Rank /Rate : FN E valuation M arks: Performance: NFIR Behavior: NFIR          OTA: NFIR
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): ,

Periods of UA : 20041201-20050216 (78 days) ,
20050222-20050720 (149 days) ,
20050621-20050719 (29 days),
20050810-20060712 (338 days).

NJPs :
20060803 : Art icle 86 (Unauthorized absence) , 3 specifications:
         - 20041201–20050216 (78 d ays) ,
         - 20050222–20050720 (149 d ays) ,
          - 20050810-2006071 3 (33 8 days) .
         Art icle 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance) .
Awarded: , , . Susp ended: , .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ 20050810-20060712,
20041201-20050216, 20050222-20050720, 20050 621 -200 5 071 9 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe) :


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Medical i ssues.
Decision

Date : 20 08 0 807      Location: Washington D.C  R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT-DRUG ABUSE .
Discussion

 Issue 1: (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his mitigate his misconduct. While he may feel this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or he should not be he ld accountable for his actions due to a medical condition. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by for violations of the U niform C ode of M ilitary J ustice, Article 86 (UA more than 30 Days), 3 specifications, and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance) . Violations of Articles 86 and 112a are considered serious offenses which are punishable by a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and up to imprisonment if adjudicated by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for an administrative discharge.

A review of the military medical record does not indicate any medical issues which would have excused the Applicant for his misconduct. The physical conducted for the Applicant at the Miramar Brig on 1 August 2006 indicates normal for all observed and examined areas, including any psychiatric issues . The Applicant states on his confinement physical examination he is depressed and admits to marijuana use; given the Applicant was going into a confinement facility , depression could be expected but this , taken in isolation, is insufficient active duty evidence to establish any psychiatric issue which caused almost 600 days of unauthorized absence over a 20 month period and illegal drug use . The military medical records do not indicate anything mentally wrong with the Applicant during his time of service nor do they excuse the Applicant’s misconduct based on a medical related issue. It should be reiterated the Applicant had extensive unauthorized absence time on numerous occasions with on e absence alone being 338 days.

When a service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s numerous extensive unauthorized absence periods combined with drug use constitutes significant negative conduct and was the cause for his discharge. The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate.
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 86 and 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201266

    Original file (MD1201266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant also acknowledged his complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 5 June 2002.Despite an Article 112a violation, which requires mandatory administrative processing, the Applicant’s command allowed him to finish his enlistment, and he was discharged at his End of Active Obligated Service with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.In accordance with Paragraph 1004 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102108

    Original file (ND1102108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701019

    Original file (MD0701019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 20050107: Applicant to UA 20050128: Applicant from UA20050130: Applicant to UA The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801447

    Original file (ND0801447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700772

    Original file (MD0700772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 2: (Clemency). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20010706 - 20020631Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020701Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050222Length of Service: 2 Yrs 1Mths0 DysLost Time:Days UA:129 Days...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900970

    Original file (ND0900970.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-DC3, USN Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20090313 Characterization of Service Received: Narrative Reason for Discharge: DUE TO DRUG ABUSE Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990625 - 19990919 Active: 19990920 – 20041130 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20041201 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701110

    Original file (ND0701110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20030109 - 20030406Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030407Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050825Length of Service: 02 Yrs 04Mths19 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700150

    Original file (MD0700150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - FOP ($849.00) for (1 month); RIR (E-1); Confinement (30 days).20060119: MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ in that I did, on or between 20050711 and 20050811, wrongfully use a controlled substance commonly referred to as marijuana.20060119: Applicant to confinement. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700825

    Original file (MD0700825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant, while assigned as the unit Equal Opportunity representative, fraternized with, attempted to commit adultery with, sexually harassed and indecently assaulted a junior, subordinate, female Marine. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901735

    Original file (MD0901735.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant provided documentation the U.S Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated him 100 percent for PTSD, but stated he could not receive paid treatment. However, the NDRB determined partial relief was warranted based on clemency and by majority rule, the NDRB voted to upgrade the discharge characterization to General (Under Honorable Conditions), but voted unanimously not to change the narrative reason for separation.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...